Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738140›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Elucidating governing factors of PFAS removal by polyamide membranes using machine learning and molecular simulations.

Nohyeong Jeong, Shinyun Park, Subhamoy Mahajan, Ji Zhou, Jens Blotevogel, Ying Li, Tiezheng Tong, Yongsheng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Analysis of Commercial and Novel High-Pressure Membranes for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Removal.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nohyeong Jeong *School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-6771
Shinyun Park *Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Subhamoy MahajanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-8588
Ji ZhouDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Jens BlotevogelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-836X
Ying LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. yli2562@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-3350
Tiezheng TongDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. tiezheng.tong@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-3330
Yongsheng ChenSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA. yongsheng.chen@ce.gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9519-2302

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2112533U.S. Department of Agriculture (United States Department of Agriculture) 2018-68011-28371U.S. Department of Agriculture (United States Department of Agriculture) Hatch Project COL00799, accession 1022591U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US Environmental Protection Agency) 840080010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have recently garnered considerable concerns regarding their impacts on human and ecological health. Despite the important roles of polyamide membranes in remediating PFASs-contaminated water, the governing factors influencing PFAS transport across these membranes remain elusive. In this study, we investigate PFAS rejection by polyamide membranes using two machine learning (ML) models, namely XGBoost and multimodal transformer models. Utilizing the Shapley additive explanation method for XGBoost model interpretation unveils the impacts of both PFAS characteristics and membrane properties on model predictions. The examination of the impacts of chemical structure involves interpreting the multimodal transformer model incorporated with simplified molecular input line entry system strings through heat maps, providing a visual representation of the attention score assigned to each atom of PFAS molecules. Both ML interpretation methods highlight the dominance of electrostatic interaction in governing PFAS transport across polyamide membranes. The roles of functional groups in altering PFAS transport across membranes are further revealed by molecular simulations. The combination of ML with computer simulations not only advances our knowledge of PFAS removal by polyamide membranes, but also provides an innovative approach to facilitate data-driven feature selection for the development of high-performance membranes with improved PFAS removal efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID39738140
PMCPMC11686221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.