Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738135›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Imagine going left versus imagine going right: whole-body motion on the lateral axis.

K Patel, J Stotter, M C Pali, I Giannopulu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K PatelSchool of Human Sciences and Humanities, University of Houston, Houston, 77001, USA.
J StotterInterdisciplinary Centre for the Artificial Mind (iCAM), Robina, 4229, Australia.
M C PaliResearch Centre On Stroke Rehabilitation, MUI, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
I GiannopuluCreative Robotics Lab, UNSW, Sydney, 2021, Australia. igiannopulu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike the conventional, embodied, and embrained whole-body movements in the sagittal forward and vertical axes, movements in the lateral/transversal axis cannot be unequivocally grounded, embodied, or embrained. When considering motor imagery for left and right directions, it is  assumed that participants have underdeveloped representations due to a lack of familiarity with moving along the lateral axis. In the current study, a 32 electroencephalography (EEG) system was used to identify the oscillatory neural signature linked with lateral axis motor imagery. Following the experimental procedure, 36 healthy participants were instructed and trained to imagine moving left and right from a first-person perspective. On average, greater beta oscillatory activity in the parietal region was observed during right motor imagery compared to left motor imagery. Furthermore, lateral whole-body motion imagery is associated with the posterior multimodal somatosensory parietal areas, which showed significantly more prominent cortico-cortical interconnections when performing right than left motor imagery, as indicated by Phase-Locked Value (PLV) analysis. The findings suggest that the mental simulation of lateral movements, reflecting immature neurocognitive schemata, might engender non-grounded and non-embedded somatosensory and kinesthetic representations that would be associated with the lateralisation of the multimodal cortical vestibular network.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyImaginationMovementAdultFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleParietal LobeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39738135
PMCPMC11686341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.