Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A qualitative study on facilitators and barriers to adoption and implementation of nutrition interventions in higher education settings in Flanders.

Evelyn Fonderie, Wendy Van Lippevelde, Benedicte Deforche, Maïté Verloigne, Lotte Braeckman, Jolien Plaete, Tom Deliens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Evelyn FonderieDepartment of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium. Evelyn.Fonderie@UGent.be.
Wendy Van LippeveldeDepartment of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 3K3, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
Lotte BraeckmanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 3K3, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
Jolien PlaeteFlemish Institute Healthy Living, Gustave Schildknechtstraat 9, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
Tom DeliensDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. Tom.Deliens@vub.be.

Funding

Stichting Tegen Kanker 2022-056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition from secondary school to college or university is a well-known and well-studied risk period for weight and/or fat gain and not meeting the dietary recommendations. Higher education acts as a promising setting to implement nutrition interventions. An important condition for intervention success is that interventions are implemented as intended by the protocol and integrated in the institutional policy. Unfortunately, to date, there is only little understanding of the factors influencing adoption and implementation of nutrition interventions in higher education settings. This study aimed to provide insight into stakeholders' perspectives on facilitators and barriers to adoption and implementation of nutrition interventions promoting healthy and sustainable diets among higher education students in Flanders. Eight online group interviews and three online individual interviews were conducted involving a total of 37 stakeholders (e.g., staff of student services and student restaurants) from ten Flemish higher education institutions with varying food policy quality scores, and one external catering company which provides catering in higher education institutions. A semi-structured interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR-framework) was used to facilitate the interviews. Afterwards, the data were analyzed using a combined inductive and deductive thematic approach led by the CFIR-framework. Most of the institutions' food policies focused on the provision and promotion of healthy and sustainable nutrition. Therefore, the reported factors in the present study consequently relate primarily to these two strategies. Stakeholders preferred to adopt low cost and institution-tailored interventions supported by experts and evidence, considering them easier and less resourceful to implement in the specific context of the institution. They stressed the importance of considering both students' and institution stakeholders' needs and perspectives in the development of nutrition interventions and implementation plans. Furthermore, interventions should be focused on a combination of different ecological levels and various strategies. Future interventions should be developed participatively and should be focused on a combination of both individual and environmental levels. Higher education institutions are encouraged to use opportunities such as creating win-win situations within the institution, working together with research groups and engaging students through student associations. The findings of this research add to the literature on implementation science and inform future development and implementation of nutrition interventions in higher education settings.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyQualitative ResearchStudentsBelgiumDiet, HealthyFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleUniversitiesAdoptionHealthyHigher educationImplementationNutrition interventionSustainable

Identifiers

PMID39738124
PMCPMC11685861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.