ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep learning models reveal the link between dynamic brain connectivity patterns and states of consciousness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generative AI as a transformational logic for cognitive neuroscience.Communications biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Decoding states of consciousness from brain activity is a central challenge in neuroscience. Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) allows the study of short-term temporal changes in functional connectivity (FC) between distributed brain areas. By clustering dFC matrices from resting-state fMRI, we previously described "brain patterns" that underlie different functional configurations of the brain at rest. The networks associated with these patterns have been extensively analyzed. However, the overall dynamic organization and how it relates to consciousness remains unclear. We hypothesized that deep learning networks would help to model this relationship. Recent studies have used low-dimensional variational autoencoders (VAE) to learn meaningful representations that can help explaining consciousness. Here, we investigated the complexity of selecting such a generative model to study brain dynamics, and extended the available methods for latent space characterization and modeling. Therefore, our contributions are threefold. First, compared with probabilistic principal component analysis and sparse VAE, we showed that the selected low-dimensional VAE exhibits balanced performance in reconstructing dFCs and classifying brain patterns. We then explored the organization of the obtained low-dimensional dFC latent representations. We showed how these representations stratify the dynamic organization of the brain patterns as well as the experimental conditions. Finally, we proposed to delve into the proposed brain computational model. We first applied a receptive field analysis to identify preferred directions in the latent space to move from one brain pattern to another. Then, an ablation study was achieved where we virtually inactivated specific brain areas. We demonstrated the model's efficiency in summarizing consciousness-specific information encoded in key inter-areal connections, as described in the global neuronal workspace theory of consciousness. The proposed framework advocates the possibility of developing an interpretable computational brain model of interest for disorders of consciousness, paving the way for a dynamic diagnostic support tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.