Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738102›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Pattern memory cannot be completely and truly realized in deep neural networks.

Tingting Li, Ruimin Lyu, Zhenping Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tingting LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Ruimin LyuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Zhenping XieSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China. xiezp@jiangnan.edu.cn.

Funding

NSFC 62272201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unknown boundary issue, between superior computational capability of deep neural networks (DNNs) and human cognitive ability, has becoming crucial and foundational theoretical problem in AI evolution. Undoubtedly, DNN-empowered AI capability is increasingly surpassing human intelligence in handling general intelligent tasks. However, the absence of DNN's interpretability and recurrent erratic behavior remain incontrovertible facts. Inspired by perceptual characteristics of human vision on optical illusions, we propose a novel working capability analysis framework for DNNs through innovative cognitive response characteristics on visual illusion images, accompanied with fine adjustable sample image construction strategy. Our findings indicate that, although DNNs can infinitely approximate human-provided empirical standards in pattern classification, object detection and semantic segmentation, they are still unable to truly realize independent pattern memorization. All super cognitive abilities of DNNs purely come from their powerful sample classification performance on similar known scenes. Above discovery establishes a new foundation for advancing artificial general intelligence.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerArtificial IntelligenceCognitionDeep LearningHumansMemory

Identifiers

PMID39738102
PMCPMC11685877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.