Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737916›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Metamaterial-based injection molding for the cost-effective production of whole cuts.

Mohammad Ghosheh, Avner Ehrlich, Amit Fischer, Laura Pasitka, Merav Cohen, Yaakov Nahmias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad GhoshehAlexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Avner EhrlichAlexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amit FischerDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Laura PasitkaAlexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0009-0008-6100-7253
Merav CohenAlexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7802-0499
Yaakov NahmiasAlexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. yaakov.nahmias@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-6051-616X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The escalating global demand for meat products has intensified ecological concerns, underscoring the need for sustainable meat alternatives. Although current methods effectively imitate ground meat, mimicking whole cuts, which constitute 54% of the global market, remains challenging due to the lack of scalable technology. Injection molding is a massively scalable manufacturing technology developed for the polymer industry. Here, we introduce two injectable metamaterials: a thermally irreversible fat composite we named proteoleogel, and a multi-scaled meat analog produced by low-temperature extrusion. Viscoelastic screening of plant proteins identifies mung bean for its ability to stabilize complex oleogel structures, mimicking the mechanics of adipose tissue. Mechanical analysis reveals that low-temperature extrusion produces microscale isotropic fibers and mesoscale anisotropic structures mimicking muscle and fascia. These metamaterials can be injection-molded into various whole cuts, from chops to T-bones. Blinded taste tests indicate a 43% preference for our plant-based steak analog. Moreover, technical economic analysis shows injection molding is more cost-effective than 3D printing, costing $9/kg compared to $38/kg. This research represents a step in sustainable food production, offering cost-effective and scalable solutions for the entire meat market.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdipose TissueAnimalsMeatMeat ProductsPlant ProteinsPrinting, Three-DimensionalVignaPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39737916
PMCPMC11686210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.