Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737913›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Direct perception of affective valence from vision.

Saeedeh Sadeghi, Zijin Gu, Eve De Rosa, Amy Kuceyeski, Adam K Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saeedeh SadeghiDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. sdsd@caltech.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0668-8147
Zijin GuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University and Cornell Tech, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0385-2677
Eve De RosaDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-4657
Amy KuceyeskiDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5050-8342
Adam K AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. aka47@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6492-6350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjective feelings are thought to arise from conceptual and bodily states. We examine whether the valence of feelings may also be decoded directly from objective ecological statistics of the visual environment. We train a visual valence (VV) machine learning model of low-level image statistics on nearly 8000 emotionally charged photographs. The VV model predicts human valence ratings of images and transfers even more robustly to abstract paintings. In human observers, limiting conceptual analysis of images enhances VV contributions to valence experience, increasing correspondence with machine perception of valence. In the brain, VV resides in lower to mid-level visual regions, where neural activity submitted to deep generative networks synthesizes new images containing positive versus negative VV. There are distinct modes of valence experience, one derived indirectly from meaning, and the other embedded in ecological statistics, affording direct perception of subjective valence as an apparent objective property of the external world.

Indexed as

EmotionsMachine LearningVisual PerceptionAdultBrainFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVision, OcularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39737913
PMCPMC11686310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.