ReviewStem cells translational medicine2025
Current perspectives on the dynamic culture of mesenchymal stromal/stem cell spheroids.
Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Biophysical Analysis of Morpho-Phenotypic and Morpho-Functional Dynamics in Normal and Cancer Spheroids within Engineered Microenvironments.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional spheroid models in breast cancer: tumor microenvironment complexity, cancer stem cell-driven resistance, and translational model integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Self-Assembled Nanoclay Gel with Spheroid MSC-Derived Exosome Mimetics to Integrate Demineralized Bone Matrix and Noggin-Targeting miRNA for Synergistic Osteogenesis.Advanced functional materials · 2026Article
- FOXO1-mediated cell cycle arrest enhances osteogenic differentiation of spheroid-cultured human periodontal ligament-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Localized heat induces ERK activation and signal propagation in solid tumors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FP003B suppresses microcarrier aggregation and enhances cell yield in microcarrier-based mesenchymal stromal cell culture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Non-Enzymatic Cell Expansion and Harvesting Using a Smart Thermo-Responsive Gel.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Spatial ecostructural modelling of endometrial cancer identifies the key role of CD90 + CD105 + endothelial cells in tumour heterogeneity and predicts disease recurrence.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Article
- Utility of Multicellular Spheroids for Investigating Mechanisms of Chemoresistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Construction of Microsphere Culture System for Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Aggregates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Alternating 2D and 3D culture reduces cell size and extends the lifespan of placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Small adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells exhibit longer telomeres and enhanced regenerative potential.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are promising candidates for regenerative medicine owing to their self-renewal properties, multilineage differentiation, immunomodulatory effects, and angiogenic potential. MSC spheroids fabricated by 3D culture have recently shown enhanced therapeutic potential. MSC spheroids create a specialized niche with tight cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions, optimizing their cellular function by mimicking the in vivo environment. Methods for 3D cultivation of MSCs can be classified into 2 main forms: static suspension culture and dynamic suspension culture. Numerous studies have reported the beneficial influence of these methods on MSCs, which is displayed by increased differentiation, angiogenic, immunomodulatory, and anti-apoptotic effects, and stemness of MSC spheroids. Particularly, recent studies highlighted the benefits of dynamic suspension cultures of the MSC spheroids in terms of faster and more compact spheroid formation and the long-term maintenance of stemness properties. However, only a few studies have compared the behavior of MSC spheroids formed using static and dynamic suspension cultures, considering the significant differences between their culture conditions. This review summarizes the differences between static and dynamic suspension culture methods and discusses the biological outcomes of MSC spheroids reported in the literature. In particular, we highlight the advantages of the dynamic suspension culture of MSC spheroids and contemplate its future applications for various diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.