Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737878›Full record

ReviewStem cells translational medicine2025

Current perspectives on the dynamic culture of mesenchymal stromal/stem cell spheroids.

Yumi Ohori-Morita, Amal Ashry, Kunimichi Niibe, Hiroshi Egusa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yumi Ohori-MoritaDivision of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.
Amal AshryDivision of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.
Kunimichi NiibeDivision of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1112-8475
Hiroshi EgusaDivision of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0200-8132

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are promising candidates for regenerative medicine owing to their self-renewal properties, multilineage differentiation, immunomodulatory effects, and angiogenic potential. MSC spheroids fabricated by 3D culture have recently shown enhanced therapeutic potential. MSC spheroids create a specialized niche with tight cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions, optimizing their cellular function by mimicking the in vivo environment. Methods for 3D cultivation of MSCs can be classified into 2 main forms: static suspension culture and dynamic suspension culture. Numerous studies have reported the beneficial influence of these methods on MSCs, which is displayed by increased differentiation, angiogenic, immunomodulatory, and anti-apoptotic effects, and stemness of MSC spheroids. Particularly, recent studies highlighted the benefits of dynamic suspension cultures of the MSC spheroids in terms of faster and more compact spheroid formation and the long-term maintenance of stemness properties. However, only a few studies have compared the behavior of MSC spheroids formed using static and dynamic suspension cultures, considering the significant differences between their culture conditions. This review summarizes the differences between static and dynamic suspension culture methods and discusses the biological outcomes of MSC spheroids reported in the literature. In particular, we highlight the advantages of the dynamic suspension culture of MSC spheroids and contemplate its future applications for various diseases.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell Culture Techniques, Three DimensionalMesenchymal Stem CellsSpheroids, CellularAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumanscell aggregationdynamic culturemesenchymal stromal/stem cellsspheroidsstatic culture

Identifiers

PMID39737878
PMCPMC11954588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.