ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Antimicrobial Polymers at the Membrane Interface: Impact of Macromolecular Architecture.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combating Antimicrobial Resistance with Hydrophilic and Eco-Friendly Membrane-Active Antibiotics Derived from Biological Nanoparticles.ACS nanoscience Au · 2026Article
- The injectable cationic double-crosslinked hydrogel facilitates bone regeneration and repair through sustained antibacterial activity.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Assessing the Mechanism of Action of Synthetic Nanoengineered Antimicrobial Polymers against the Bacterial Membrane ofBiomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Lipoic Acid Based Redox-Responsive Degradable Antimicrobial Polymers.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Article
- AI-Assisted Tools for Scientific Review Writing: Opportunities and Cautions.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Review
- Bioinspired Cationic Antimicrobial Polymers.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Polymers at the Membrane Interface: Impact of Macromolecular Architecture.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major cause of death worldwide. This urges the search for alternatives to antibiotics, and antimicrobial polymers hold promise due to their reduced susceptibility to AMR. The topology of such macromolecules has a strong impact on their activity, with bottlebrush architectures outperforming their linear counterparts significantly. Consequently, understanding the specific behavior of macromolecules featuring a confined conformation of linear subunits is pertinent. This study focusses on revealing fundamental differences between architectures regarding properties as well as interaction with biological membranes. Various analytical techniques (using membrane mimics and spectroscopic methods) are used to generate insights revealing the following trends: A) The reduction of degrees of freedom in bottle brushes reduces their tendencies for self-assembly and undesired protein interaction. B) When compared to linear polymers, bottlebrushes attach to membranes faster and more efficiently as well as in a unimolecular fashion. Their multivalent presentation of linear subunits also leads to aggregation between liposomes, which is not induced by linear polymers. C) Neutron reflectometry measurements show an increased tendency of bottle brushes to insert into the hydrophobic tails of phospholipid monolayers. The knowledge about these features will fuel the future development of even more efficient antimicrobial polymers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.