ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
A sample size analysis of a mathematical model of longitudinal tumor volume and progression-free survival for Bayesian individual dynamic predictions in recurrent high-grade glioma.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A sample size analysis of a mathematical model of longitudinal tumor volume and progression-free survival for Bayesian individual dynamic predictions in recurrent high-grade glioma.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) have a poor prognosis with median progression-free survival (PFS) of <7 months. Responses to treatment are heterogenous, suggesting a clinical need for prognostic models. Bayesian data analysis can exploit individual patient follow-up imaging studies to adaptively predict the risk of progression. We propose a novel sample size analysis for Bayesian individual dynamic predictions and demonstrate proof of principle. We coupled a nonlinear mixed effects tumor growth inhibition model with a survival model. Longitudinal tumor volumes and time-to-progression were simulated for 2000 in silico rHGG patients. Bayesian individual dynamic predictions of PFS curves were evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier skill score (BSS). We investigated the effects of sample size on AUC and BSS margins of error. A power law relationship was observed between sample size and margins of error of AUC and BSS. Sample size was also found to be negatively correlated with margins of error and landmark time. We explored the use of this sample size analysis as a clinical look-up table for prospective clinical trial design and retrospective clinical data analysis. Here, we motivate the application of Bayesian individual dynamic predictions as a clinical end point for clinical trial design. Doing so could aid in the development of study protocols with patient-specific adaptations (escalate or de-escalate dose or frequency of drug administration, increase or decrease the frequency of follow-up, or change therapeutic modality) according to patient-specific prognosis. Future developments of this approach will focus on further model development and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.