Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737733›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

A sample size analysis of a mathematical model of longitudinal tumor volume and progression-free survival for Bayesian individual dynamic predictions in recurrent high-grade glioma.

Daniel J Glazar, Solmaz Sahebjam, Hsiang-Husan M Yu, Dung-Tsa Chen, Menal Bhandari, Heiko Enderling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel J GlazarDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3031-8629
Solmaz SahebjamDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-9937
Hsiang-Husan M YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0621-9519
Dung-Tsa ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5026-415X
Menal BhandariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Heiko EnderlingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9696-6410

Funding

Developing mathematical model driven optimized recurrent glioblastoma therapiesR21CA263911 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI YU, HSIANG-HSUAN MICHAEL · 2021 to 2022
$420k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) have a poor prognosis with median progression-free survival (PFS) of <7 months. Responses to treatment are heterogenous, suggesting a clinical need for prognostic models. Bayesian data analysis can exploit individual patient follow-up imaging studies to adaptively predict the risk of progression. We propose a novel sample size analysis for Bayesian individual dynamic predictions and demonstrate proof of principle. We coupled a nonlinear mixed effects tumor growth inhibition model with a survival model. Longitudinal tumor volumes and time-to-progression were simulated for 2000 in silico rHGG patients. Bayesian individual dynamic predictions of PFS curves were evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier skill score (BSS). We investigated the effects of sample size on AUC and BSS margins of error. A power law relationship was observed between sample size and margins of error of AUC and BSS. Sample size was also found to be negatively correlated with margins of error and landmark time. We explored the use of this sample size analysis as a clinical look-up table for prospective clinical trial design and retrospective clinical data analysis. Here, we motivate the application of Bayesian individual dynamic predictions as a clinical end point for clinical trial design. Doing so could aid in the development of study protocols with patient-specific adaptations (escalate or de-escalate dose or frequency of drug administration, increase or decrease the frequency of follow-up, or change therapeutic modality) according to patient-specific prognosis. Future developments of this approach will focus on further model development and validation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaModels, TheoreticalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalROC CurveSample SizeTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID39737733
PMCPMC11919271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.