Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737676›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Habitat Restorations in an Urban Landscape Rapidly Assemble Diverse Pollinator Communities That Persist.

Jens Ulrich, Risa D Sargent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jens UlrichDepartment of Applied Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0800-1393
Risa D SargentDepartment of Applied Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8736-5712

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological restoration is a leading approach to mitigating biodiversity decline. While restoration often leads to an immediate increase in species abundance or diversity, it is rarely clear whether it supports longer-term biodiversity gains at the landscape scale. To examine the impacts of urban restoration on pollinator biodiversity, we conducted a 3-year natural experiment in 18 parks across a large metropolitan area. We applied an occupancy model to our survey data to determine how restoration, woody plant density and pollinator specialisation impacted interannual pollinator metacommunity dynamics. Restoration drove a rapid increase in pollinator species occurrence that was maintained through a positive balance between colonisation and persistence, resulting in pollinator species richness gains that are retained. We conclude that urban restoration can effectively conserve pollinator biodiversity by influencing the processes that underlie long-term population stability. Our results highlight the need to study the long-term effects of restoration in different landscape contexts.

Indexed as

BiodiversityPollinationAnimalsCitiesConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationInsectaconservationhabitat restorationmetacommunity dynamicsnetworkoccupancy modelspollinationpollinatorsspecialisationurban ecology

Identifiers

PMID39737676
PMCPMC11687344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.