Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737670›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Seasonal Assembly of Nectar Microbial Communities Across Angiosperm Plant Species: Assessing Contributions of Climate and Plant Traits.

Jacob M Cecala, Leta Landucci, Rachel L Vannette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob M CecalaDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-8517
Leta LanducciDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-2084
Rachel L VannetteDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-3468

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology 1846266National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-67034-35157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-microbe associations are ubiquitous, but parsing contributions of dispersal, host filtering, competition and temperature on microbial community composition is challenging. Floral nectar-inhabiting microbes, which can influence flowering plant health and pollination, offer a tractable system to disentangle community assembly processes. We inoculated a synthetic community of yeasts and bacteria into nectars of 31 plant species while excluding pollinators. We monitored weather and, after 24 h, collected and cultured communities. We found a strong signature of plant species on resulting microbial abundance and community composition, in part explained by plant phylogeny and nectar peroxide content, but not floral morphology. Increasing temperature reduced microbial diversity, while higher minimum temperatures increased growth, suggesting complex ecological effects of temperature. Consistent nectar microbial communities within plant species could enable plant or pollinator adaptation. Our work supports the roles of host identity, traits and temperature in microbial community assembly, and indicates diversity-productivity relationships within host-associated microbiomes.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaMicrobiotaPlant NectarSeasonsBacteriaClimateTemperaturePlant Nectarbacteriacoexistencecommunity assemblymicrobiomenectarplant–microbepollination syndromespecies interactionssynthetic communityyeasts

Identifiers

PMID39737670
PMCPMC11687353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.