ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Disentangling the Impact of Forest Management Intensity Components on Soil Biological Processes.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reforestation Under Climate Change-A Cross-Regional Deadwood Retention Experiment to Develop Multifunctional Forests on Disturbed Norway Spruce Areas.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Temperate Forest Floors: Ecosystem Hubs in Transition?Global change biology · 2026Review
- Gastric mucosal repair by Men's Huwei Powder via EGF-NO/PGE2-PI3K-TLR4 in RELISH: Restoring Equilibrium through long-term integration of synergistic health.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temperate forests cover 25% of the world's forest area and most of them are managed for timber production. To increase yields, native deciduous trees have been commonly replaced by fast-growing conifers, especially in Western and Central Europe. Despite the importance of forest soils for a variety of ecosystem functions, the effects of forest management intensity on soil biological processes have not yet been sufficiently understood. Using a standardized sampling protocol that covers 200 plots across four regions with different abiotic site conditions, our study aims at disentangling the effects of individual components of forest management intensity such as (i) share of native deciduous trees, (ii) timber harvesting volume, and (iii) natural deadwood volume on soil biological processes. Our findings indicate that the effects of management practices on soil biological processes are as important as abiotic factors, such as subsoil pH value and soil texture. Piecewise structural equation modeling revealed that forest management has both direct and indirect effects on soil biological processes via humus form and topsoil pH. Generally, the ratio of deciduous and coniferous trees had the most significant effect on nutrient cycling and soil properties, followed by nutrient extraction through timber harvesting and natural deadwood volume. The strength of the observed effects was modified by regional variations in climate, topography, and bedrock. Our findings underline the high diagnostic value of humus form as an indicator of biological processes in mineral topsoil (particularly pH, C/N, and microbial characteristics can be predicted) that can guide forest managers in evaluating soil quality and identifying management impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.