ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Precise identification of somatic and germline variants in the absence of matched normal samples.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Somatic likelihood tiering: an interpretable post-calling triage protocol for tumor-only whole-exome variant review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics profiling reveals distinct evolutionary and immunogenic features of brain oligometastasis in lung adenocarcinoma.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on the detection and clinical application of tumor mutational burden.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Synth4bench: generating synthetic data for benchmarking tumor-only somatic variant calling algorithms.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Personalized and Tumor Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Assay for Molecular Residual Disease Monitoring of Solid Malignancies.MedComm · 2025Article
- Improving plant breeding through AI-supported data integration.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Genomic and clinical insights into ovarian cancer: subtype-specific alterations and predictors of metastasis and relapse.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive characterization of PD-L1 expression and immunotherapy-related genomic biomarkers in early- versus advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Deciphering Circadian Rhythm-Related Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer and Establishing a Prognostic Prediction Model.BioMed research international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Somatic variants play a crucial role in the occurrence and progression of cancer. However, in the absence of matched normal controls, distinguishing between germline and somatic variants becomes challenging in tumor samples. The existing tumor-only genomic analysis methods either suffer from limited performance or insufficient interpretability due to an excess of features. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an alternative approach that can address these issues and have practical implications. Here, we presented OncoTOP, a computational method for genomic analysis without matched normal samples, which can accurately distinguish somatic mutations from germline variants. Reference sample analysis revealed a 0% false positive rate and 99.7% reproducibility for variant calling. Assessing 2864 tumor samples across 18 cancer types yielded a 99.8% overall positive percent agreement and a 99.9% positive predictive value. OncoTOP can also accurately detect clinically actionable variants and subclonal mutations associated with drug resistance. For the prediction of mutation origins, the positive percent agreement stood at 97.4% for predicting somatic mutations and 95.7% for germline mutations. High consistency of tumor mutational burden (TMB) was observed between the results generated by OncoTOP and tumor-normal paired analysis. In a cohort of 97 lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy, TMB-high patients had prolonged PFS (P = .02), proving the reliability of our approach in estimating TMB to predict therapy response. Furthermore, microsatellite instability status showed a strong concordance (97%) with polymerase chain reaction results, and leukocyte antigens class I subtypes and homozygosity achieved an impressive concordance rate of 99.3% and 99.9% respectively, compared to its tumor-normal paired analysis. Thus, OncoTOP exhibited high reliability in variant calling, mutation origin prediction, and biomarker estimation. Its application will promise substantial advantages for clinical genomic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.