Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737539›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Maternal postpartum infection risk following induction of labor: A Danish national cohort study.

Sidsel Hogh-Poulsen, Sif Emilie Carlsen, Jane M Bendix, Tine D Clausen, Ellen C L Lokkegaard, Paul Vignir Bryde Axelsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sidsel Hogh-PoulsenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Denmark.
Sif Emilie CarlsenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Denmark.
Jane M BendixDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-6689
Tine D ClausenDepartment of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ellen C L LokkegaardDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Denmark.
Paul Vignir Bryde AxelssonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8403-0084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInduction of labor is a common procedure, and in Denmark, approximately one in four vaginal deliveries are induced. The association between induction and maternal postpartum infections such as endometritis, surgical site infection after cesarean section, urinary tract infection, and sepsis has been sparsely investigated. Our objective was to investigate the association between induction of labor and risk of maternal postpartum infection and to identify potential risk factors for infection. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a nationwide cohort study, all deliveries with live-born singletons from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017 (n = 546 864) were included. Deliveries were grouped into categories of spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, and elective cesarean section. The primary outcome was any infection within 30 days postpartum based on discharge diagnosis codes and redeemed antibiotic prescriptions for endometritis, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Analyses were done using logistic regression.

resultsInfection within 30 days postpartum was found among 8.5% of the women undergoing induction of labor compared to 6.8% of the women with spontaneous onset of labor. In adjusted logistic regression analyses, the risk of postpartum infection was significantly increased after induction of labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor (adjusted ORs [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.27). Women with rupture of membranes were not at increased risk of postpartum infection (aOR 1.01; 95%CI 0.94-1.09). The risk of postpartum maternal sepsis was not significantly associated with induction of labor. Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, and long education were all associated with increased risk of maternal postpartum infection, while either a low or high body mass index and previous deliveries were associated with decreased risk.

conclusionsInduction of labor was associated with an increased risk of maternal postpartum infection. However, the absolute risk was 1.7% higher for the women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor, which we believe should not be a cause for concern. Unexpectedly, low and high body mass index was associated with decreased risk of infection, and rupture of membranes was not associated with increased risk after induction of labor, which might reflect actual clinical management.

Indexed as

Labor, InducedPuerperal InfectionAdultCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDenmarkEndometritisFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionUrinary Tract Infectionsbirthbirth complicationsendometritisinfectionpostpartum infectionsepsissurgical site infectionurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID39737539
PMCPMC11782083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.