ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2024
On-the-spot spirometry & combined salbutamol & glycopyrronium reversibility testing in obstructive airway disease: A real-world appraisal.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Normal spirometry with high and asthma-defining bronchodilator responsiveness: An appraisal from real-life data.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- The precision bronchodilator therapy in airflow limitation with asthma defining reversibility: An appraisal through pharmaco-responsiveness-based real-world observation.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Exploring the possibility of a predictable precision therapy of COPD with inclusion of glycopyrronium responsiveness: A real-world experience.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives Spirometric glycopyrronium responsiveness, a new advent, needs to be examined at in terms of degree and frequency in different obstructive-airway diseases diagnosed in real world practise. Methods Serial and willing symptomatic affected individuals of suspected airway disease underwent a pragmatic post-consultation spirometry-protocol on the same day with salbutamol followed by glycopyrronium bromide. The diagnosis of asthma (FEV1-reversibility ≥ 200 ml + 12%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1/FVC<0.7 and FEV1-reversibility <200 ml and/or 12%), and 'unclassified' (neither asthma nor COPD) were determined on post-salbutamol changes. The performances of the two classes of bronchodilators were compared on FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEV1, and FEF-25-75 while the relative frequency of significant responsiveness for salbutamol (≥200 ml) and glycopyrronium (≥100 ml) were noted. Results Fifteen hundred and eighty study participants consisting of asthma (n=329; 21%), COPD (n=641; 40%), and 'unclassified' (n=610; 39%) were included. Both salbutamol and glycopyrronium had demonstrated improvement across the spirometric parameters. The salbutamol responsiveness was statistically significant in all but COPD in terms of absolute values of FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25-75 and the glycopyrronium responsiveness was significant in all plus COPD in FVC, FEV1, and FEF25-75 values. While all the asthmatics, 9.83 per cent of 'unclassified' study participants, and none of the COPD affected individuals had significant FEV1 responsiveness to salbutamol, the glycopyrronium responsiveness for the three conditions were 38.3, 40.25 and 24.26 per cent, respectively. The combined reversibility for asthma, COPD, and unclassified were 401.5±173.9, 119.5±109.3, and 158.7±136.3 ml, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions Spirometry with serial salbutamol and glycopyrronium responsiveness may prove helpful in identifying syndromic diagnosis and choosing the bronchodilator treatment of airway diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.