ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Preoperative difference between 2D and 3D planning correlates with difference between planned and achieved surgical correction in patient-specific instrumented total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weight-bearing 3D morphology of valgus knees: A comparative study within a varus dominant cohort.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Time- and cost-effective manufacturing of 3D templates of the pelvis and acetabulum in primary and revision hip arthroplasty using semiautomatic segmentation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using patient-specific instruments and custom-made plates results in accurate correction and improved clinical outcome measures at 1-year follow-up.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Preoperative difference between 2D and 3D planning correlates with difference between planned and achieved surgical correction in patient-specific instrumented total knee arthroplasty.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The goals of this study were (1) to assess whether the preoperative difference between modalities and extent of deformity are associated with a higher difference between planned and achieved surgical correction and (2) if they yield a higher probability of intraoperative adjustments. Methods: Retrospective single-centre analysis of patients undergoing patient-specific instrumented (PSI) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Preoperative radiographic parameters were analysed on weightbearing (WB) long-leg radiographs (LLR) and nonweightbearing (NWB) computed tomography (CT). The 2D/3D difference was calculated as the difference between preoperative WB-LLR (2D) hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and NWB CT (3D) HKA. Surgical records were screened to retrieve intraoperative adjustments to the preoperative plan. Postoperative assessment was performed on WB LLR. Results: Two-hundred-eighty-two knees of 263 patients were analysed. The difference of postoperative achieved to planned HKA (HKA Conclusion: The extent of deformity is associated with residual coronal deformity following PSI-TKA. Patients with extensive coronal malalignment may benefit from an adaptation of the preoperative surgical plan to avoid unintended postoperative coronal malalignment. Despite the advancements with 3D preoperative planning, intraoperative adjustments in PSI-TKA are frequently performed, in particular in patients with a higher preoperative varus/valgus deformity. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.