Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737311›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

No Right Way: Removal of a Pencil Foreign Body From a Male Urethra.

Fraser Barbour, John Hayes, Ahmad Khalifa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fraser BarbourUrology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, GBR.
John HayesUrology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, GBR.
Ahmad KhalifaUrology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foreign body insertion into the urethra is uncommonly encountered in urology practice. Such insertion can result in a myriad of problems including bleeding, infectious sequelae, urinary retention, urethral injury or rupture, and resultant urethral stricture formation. This article describes a case in which an elderly male inserted a pencil into his urethra, which subsequently became lodged and required removal under regional anesthesia in the operating theater. The foreign body resulted in urethral damage in the form of a false passage within the bulbomembranous urethra. The pencil was removed with forceps, followed by undertaking a check rigid ureteroscopy and cystoscopy before placement of a urethral catheter via a guidewire. Postoperatively, the patient developed urinary sepsis requiring an extended course of intravenous antibiotics. The catheter was left in situ for six weeks before removal to allow satisfactory urethral healing.

Indexed as

dangerous sexual practicesemergency urologyforeign bodiesforeign body retrievalurology trauma

Identifiers

PMID39737311
PMCPMC11684878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.