ArticleCureus2024
Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Tobacco Use Among Physicians in Madinah City, Saudi Arabia, in 2024.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smoking and Vaping Profiles of Healthcare Workers and Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding Vaping.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2026Article
- Prevalence and correlates of smoked and smokeless tobacco use in Saudi Arabia: evidence from the 2021 national health survey.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Smoking is recognized as a major public health issue globally; it is widely distributed among people of various origins and races in the world despite hard efforts on cessation programs. Its health hazards extend to dangerous complications, which mostly end in death according to statistics around the world. Tobacco use is influenced by several factors, which may include social pressures from peers, family influences, and media portrayals of smoking. This study aimed to identify the smoking prevalence among Madinah physicians, the influencing factor of their tobacco use, and their tobacco-related attitudes. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted involving physicians working in selected district hospitals in Madinah. Participants were recruited using a convenience sampling technique and were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire in English. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, employing a chi-square analysis to assess smoking prevalence and influencing factors. Results The study involved 427 physicians, with 206 (48.2%) Saudi and 277 (64.9%) male. Most participants' ages ranged between 25 and 34 (38%). Smokers accounted for 85 (19.9%) participants, while previous smokers numbered 20 (4.7%). Male gender was significantly associated with smoking. Stress and social influence were the most common influencing factors, 62 (44.2%) and 26 (20.9%), respectively. The most common types of smoking products used among both groups were electronic cigarettes (42, 35.6%), cigarettes (40, 32.2%), and water pipes (22, 19.2%). Most physicians agreed on the importance of physicians serving as role models for the community representing 52 (61.2%) of tobacco users and 286 (83.6%) of non-tobacco users. Conclusion This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, patterns, and implications of tobacco use among physicians in Madinah. The findings underscore a significant public health concern, revealing that a notable proportion of physicians are current or former tobacco users. Key demographic factors such as gender, age, and nationality demonstrate clear associations with tobacco use, highlighting the need for targeted interventions tailored to these specific groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.