Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Women show enhanced proprioceptive target estimation through visual-proprioceptive conflict resolution.

Anderson Barcelos de Melo, Jesus Landeira-Fernandez, Thomas Eichenberg Krahe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anderson Barcelos de MeloDepartamento de Psicologia, Laboratório de Neurociência do Comportamento, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jesus Landeira-FernandezDepartamento de Psicologia, Laboratório de Neurociência do Comportamento, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thomas Eichenberg KraheDepartamento de Psicologia, Laboratório de Neurociência do Comportamento, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To form a unified and coherent perception of the organism's state and its relationship with the surrounding environment, the nervous system combines information from various sensory modalities through multisensory integration processes. Occasionally, data from two or more sensory channels may provide conflicting information. This is particularly evident in experiments using the mirror-guided drawing task and the mirror-box illusion, where there is conflict between positional estimates guided by vision and proprioception. This study combined two experimental protocols (the mirror-box and the mirror-guided drawing tasks) to examine whether the learned resolution of visuo-proprioceptive conflicts in the mirror-guided drawing task would improve proprioceptive target estimation of men and women during the mirror-box test. Our results confirm previous findings of visual reaching bias produced by the mirror-box illusion and show that this effect is progressively reduced by improvement in the mirror drawing task performance. However, this was only observed in women. We discuss these findings in the context of possible gender differences in multisensory integration processes as well as in embodiment.

Indexed as

embodimentmirror box illusionmirror drawingmultisensory integrationstar-tracingvisuomotor adaptationvisuo-proprioceptive conflictvisuo-proprioceptive recalibration

Identifiers

PMID39737242
PMCPMC11684459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.