ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Cross-regional cultural recognition of adolescent voice emotion.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In previous studies, an in-group advantage in emotion recognition has been demonstrated to suggest that individuals are more proficient in identifying emotions within their own culture than in other cultures. However, the existing research focuses mainly on the cross-cultural variations in vocal emotion recognition, with limited attention paid to exploring intracultural differences. Furthermore, there is little research conducted on the ability of adolescents to recognize the emotions conveyed by vocal cues in various cultural settings. To fill these research gaps, three experiments were conducted in this study to explore the differences among different regions within a culture. Methods: The study involved three experiments. In Experiment 1, a within-subjects design of 2 (language: Mandarin vs. English) × 4 (emotion: anger vs. fear vs. happiness vs. sadness) was used to establish whether adolescents exhibit a similar in-group advantage in vocal emotion recognition with adults. As an expansion of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 incorporated the Shaoxing dialect to assess the ability of adolescents to identify the emotions in voices across different cultural regions of a nation. In Experiment 3, the regional variation was extended by substituting the Shaoxing dialect with Tibetan to explore the disparities in vocal emotion recognition among adolescents. Results: As indicated by the results of Experiment 1, Mandarin Conclusion: Chinese adolescents demonstrated a stronger ability to recognize vocal emotions within their own cultural group compared to other regional cultures, an advantage that became more pronounced as the cultural differences between groups increased. These findings underscore the significance of cultural factors in adolescent emotional recognition research, indicating the directions of cross-cultural interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.