Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

AI performance assessment in blended learning: mechanisms and effects on students' continuous learning motivation.

Hao Ji, Lingling Suo, Hua Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao JiManagement College, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.
Lingling SuoManagement College, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.
Hua ChenManagement College, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Blended learning combines the strengths of online and offline teaching and has become a popular approach in higher education. Despite its advantages, maintaining and enhancing students' continuous learning motivation in this mode remains a significant challenge. Methods: This study utilizes questionnaire surveys and structural equation modeling to examine the role of AI performance assessment in influencing students' continuous learning motivation in a blended learning environment. Results: The results indicate that AI performance assessment positively influences students' continuous learning motivation indirectly through expectation confirmation, perceived usefulness, and learning satisfaction. However, AI performance assessment alone does not have a direct impact on continuous learning motivation. Discussion: To address these findings, this study suggests measures to improve the effectiveness of AI performance assessment systems in blended learning. These include providing diverse evaluation metrics, recommending personalized learning paths, offering timely and detailed feedback, fostering teacher-student interactions, improving system quality and usability, and visualizing learning behaviors for better tracking.

Indexed as

AI performance assessmentblended learningcontinuous learning motivationeducational technologyexpectation confirmation model (ECM)

Identifiers

PMID39737232
PMCPMC11683091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.