Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737219›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with advanced rare cancer: a multi-centre, non-blinded, open-label phase II basket trial.

Abha A Gupta, Anna Tinker, Derek Jonker, Rahma Jamal, Hal Hirte, Eric W Winquist, Quincy Chu, Christian Kollmannsberger, Ralph Wong, Thierry Alcindor and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02879162 (A Phase II Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Patients With Advanced Rare Tumours), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02879162 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Patients With Advanced Rare Tumours

TypeinterventionalSponsorCanadian Cancer Trials GroupRan2016 to 2025Enrolled140ConditionsAdvanced Rare TumoursArmsDurvalumab, Tremelimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Abha A GuptaUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anna TinkerCAVA - BCCA - Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Derek JonkerOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rahma JamalCHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hal HirteJuravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Eric W WinquistLondon Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada.
Quincy ChuCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Christian KollmannsbergerCAVA - BCCA - Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ralph WongCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Thierry AlcindorThe Research Institute of the McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Torsten O NielsenBC Cancer and Molecular and Advanced Pathology Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ming TsaoUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tricia R CottrellCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Diane ProvencherCHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
John HiltonOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Monika K KrzyżanowskaUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christine ElserUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sebastien HotteJuravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Joana SederiasCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Siwei ZhangCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Wei TuCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Janet DanceyCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dual inhibition of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been shown to be an effective treatment strategy in many cancers. We sought to determine the objective response rate of combination durvalumab (D) plus tremelimumab (TM) in parallel cohorts of patients with carefully selected rare cancer types in which these agents had not previously been evaluated in phase II trials and for which there was clinical or biological rationale for dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy to be active. Methods: We designed a multi-centre, non-blinded, open-label phase II basket trial with each of the following 8 rare cancers considered a separate phase II trial: salivary carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and/or expressing PD-L1, mucosal melanoma, acral melanoma, osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCCO) or squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). The primary objective was to evaluate the response rate of the combination of D and TM, and the secondary objectives were to evaluate the tolerability and safety of D and TM combination. Eligible patients had advanced, metastatic or recurrent, or unresectable cancer with no known life-prolonging treatment option, age ≥16 years, ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Patients received D (1500 mg IV) + TM (75 mg IV) on Day 1 q4 weeks for 4 cycles followed by D q4 weeks until disease progression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02879162. Findings: From December 14th, 2016, to August 14, 2019, 140 patients enrolled into seven cohorts. The rare melanoma cohorts were closed due to lack of accrual. Of the 140 patients enrolled, 138 were eligible, 138 were evaluable for toxicity and 128 (91%) were evaluable for response. Durable responses were noted in all cohorts except for osteosarcoma. The overall response rate for eligible patients was 16% (95% CI: 10-23%). The response rates in each cancer cohort were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma 15% (n = 3/20; 95% CI 3-38%), salivary carcinoma 20% (n = 4/20; 95% CI: 6-44%), CUP 17% (n = 3/18; 95% CI 4-41%), SCCA 10% (n = 2/20; 95% CI 12-32%) and CCCO 21% (n = 8/39; 95% CI 9-37%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were rare, where 4 patients experienced grade 4 related events and39 patients experienced grade 3 events. Interpretation: Durvalumab + tremelimumab treatment resulted in meaningful responses in salivary carcinoma and CCCO and deserves further exploration in front-line studies. Funding: AstraZeneca and Canadian Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Checkpoint inhibitorsOvarian carcinomaRare cancers

Identifiers

PMID39737219
PMCPMC11683278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.