ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024
What are clinically significant anti-drug antibodies and why is it important to identify them.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women's Special Issue Series: Biomedicines (2nd Edition).Biomedicines · 2026Article
- From anti-drug antibody incidence to clinical relevance: interpreting highly sensitive immunogenicity assays in biosimilars.Bioanalysis · 2026Article
- HLA Class II Alleles DRB1*11:01 and DQB1*03:01 Unmask Immunogenetic Susceptibility to Anti-Nivolumab Antibodies in Combination with Ipilimumab.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Molecular Survival Strategies Against Kidney Filtration: Implications for Therapeutic Protein Engineering.Biophysica · 2026Article
- The immunogenicity database collaborative: a standardized, publicly available database for clinical immunogenicity observations and insights.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in targeting protein degradation for tumor immunotherapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Optimizing Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy: An Overview of Pharmacokinetics, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.Cancers · 2025Review
- Fifty years of monoclonals: the past, present and future of antibody therapeutics.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025Article
- Formulation of Recombinant Therapeutic Proteins: Technological Innovation, Regulations, and Evolution Towards Buffer-Free Formulations.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Mechanistic insights into resistance mechanisms to T cell engagers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The FDA has released new draft guidance to standardize how immunogenicity of protein therapeutics is described in product labels. A key aspect to this new guidance is that companies should describe anti-drug antibodies that have clinical significance in addition to reporting ADAs' incidence. Factors to consider when determining clinical significance include if those antibodies have a significant effect on the drug's pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and/or safety. While in many instances, the humoral response to protein therapeutics does not have any clinical significance, there are cases where there is a clinically significant effect and it is important to communicate this information to physicians and patients. This new guidance also delineates where immunogenicity information should be listed in product labels which should provide consistency in how this information is listed. There are many factors that contribute to a therapeutic's immunogenicity and determining clinical significance is both complex and challenging, requiring that companies perform thorough analyses with scientific rigor. The analysis that is now proposed to understand clinical significance of ADAs is a new concept and will require companies to develop a strategy for compliance. This manuscript sets forth some of the key considerations in answering this important question. One of the benefits that this new guidance will provide is a common approach for describing the immune response to therapeutics that will be located in a dedicated section of the label, providing valuable consistency across protein therapeutics. Section 12.6 in the Clinical Pharmacology portion of the label will contain the relevant immunogenicity information, which will make it much simpler to find immunogenicity information in product labels. This new guidance is currently being utilized for new protein therapeutics and companies are being requested to systematically revise the labels of previously approved drugs for compliance, although an absolute timeline for this has not been established as of this writing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.