ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2024
Epidemiology, patient characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients with narcolepsy in Sweden: a non-interventional study using secondary data.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objectives: To estimate the prevalence and incidence and evaluate the treatment patterns of patients diagnosed with narcolepsy in specialist care in Sweden. Methods: This non-interventional retrospective longitudinal study used Swedish register data from 2010 to 2020 and included patients diagnosed with narcolepsy (either type 1 or type 2), recorded in specialist outpatient and inpatient care from January 2015 to December 2019. All patients received an index date corresponding to the date of the first narcolepsy diagnosis. Results: The prevalence and incidence of narcolepsy were 14.7/100 000 and 0.9/100 000 individuals, respectively, with a greater proportion of females than males. The study included 1846 prevalent narcolepsy patients of either type, of which 466 were incident. The majority of prevalent patients (87.9%) were prescribed narcolepsy-related treatment at index with stimulants being the most common treatment. Both in the years before and after index, the most used medication by prevalent patients was stimulants (42.4% and 54.8%, respectively). Among incident patients, stimulants were the most common drug in the year after index (57.0%). Treatment switching following index was frequent and a large share of incident patients who started on modafinil were switched to stimulants. Conclusions: The prevalence of narcolepsy was lower than previously reported and was higher in females than in males; incidence was comparable throughout the study period. At index, not all patients used narcolepsy-related medications, potentially indicating a hesitance towards treatment and/or a need for faster initiation of treatment following index. Many patients were switched from the treatment they first initiated after diagnosis, which might be due to a lack of efficacy and/or unacceptable side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.