ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Improving STEMI Management Internationally: Initial Report of the American College of Cardiology-Global Heart Attack Treatment Initiative.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Osaka Prognostic Score as a Novel Predictor of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Shock Timing in STEMI-CS: Management and Outcomes in a Resource-Limited Setting.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Silk-Fibroin-Based Strategies for Myocardial Infarction Repair: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Elevated angiography-derived microvascular resistance and HbA1c levels jointly predict adverse outcomes in patients with diabetic STEMI: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade: Ready to CELEBRATE a New Dawn?European cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The burden of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) worldwide is increasing as the leading cause of death; there are scant data on system-based initiatives and performance metrics relative to its management in low- and middle-income countries where resources are frequently limited. Objectives: The Global Heart Attack Treatment Initiative (GHATI) ultimate aim is improving evidence-based STEMI care, adherence to guidelines, and tracking of clinical and institutional indicators in low- and middle-income countries. To achieve that goal, the process of care and outcomes of STEMI patients in those nations will be studied. Methods: In this initial phase of GHATI (2019-2021), prospective analyses of selected STEMI metrics derived from the American College of Cardiology Chest Pain MI Registry were undertaken in 18 international hospitals, most located in developing countries unfamiliar with quality improvement metrics. Results: Of 4,092 patients enrolled, complete data were available in 3,914 consecutive STEMIs included here: 80.5% male; 35.5% smokers; shock on arrival in 10%; and 5.1% with cardiac arrest before intervention. Overall, a 2% improvement on combined endpoints (shock; arrest before or after intervention; final ejection fraction <40%; survival at discharge) was observed over time, and survivorship also increased by 2% ( Conclusions: This global contemporary registry successfully enrolled STEMI patients in nations generally unfamiliar with quality improvement metrics; trends of improvement in their care were observed. GHATI may facilitate implementation of policies aimed at enhancing outcomes of cardiovascular disease worldwide, particularly in countries with evolving economies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.