ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Comparable results for the Femoral Neck System and three-screw fixation in femoral neck fracture treatment.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To report outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) treated with Femoral Neck System (FNS) and to compare the risks of later conversion to arthroplasty for FNS and fixation with cannulated screws (CNSs). Design: A retrospective study. Setting: A single-center study (Turku University Hospital, Finland). Patients: Data on 51 patients with FNFs treated with FNS between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, data on 301 patients treated with cannulated screws were collected and analyzed in a previous study. Intervention: Patients with FNFs underwent osteosynthesis with FNS. Main Outcome Measurements: Patients' preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed and measured to determine preoperative displacement, preoperative posterior tilt, and quality of reduction. Later conversion to arthroplasty and other reoperations were recorded. The risk of later conversion to arthroplasty was compared between the FNS group and CNS group. Results: The overall reoperation rate in the FNS group was 20%, and 16% of the patients treated with FNS underwent later conversion to arthroplasty. In the multivariate analysis, age, sex, and fracture displacement were not associated with increased risk of later conversion to arthroplasty. In comparison with fixation with cannulated screws, there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of later conversion to arthroplasty between the groups. Conclusion: FNS seems to have a comparable reoperation rate and conversion-to-arthroplasty rate compared with the gold standard treatment. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.