ArticleCytoJournal2024
Molecular classification of endometrial cancer: Impact on adjuvant treatment planning.
Article in CytoJournal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Incidence and Outcomes of Occult Uterine Cancer in Uteri Removed for Prolapse-Can We Define a "Very Low-Risk" Occult Endometrial Cancer Phenotype?International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Advanced Endometrial Cancer Patients: 12-Year Experience of an ESGO Certified Center.Cancers · 2026Article
- Prognostic characteristics and recurrence patterns of grade 1 endometrial carcinoma: a large retrospective analysis of a tertiary center.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The traditional histopathological analysis of endometrial cancer (EC) is the main risk group classification tool (low, intermediate, high-intermediate, and high) for the implementation of adjuvant treatment. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system of EC has incorporated a new molecular classification that serves as a new triage tool for optimal treatment planning for these patients. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of the new molecular classification in EC. Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the 1 Results: The study included 65 patients with presumed early endometrial. All patients underwent surgery and subsequent molecular testing. Among the patients, 35 (54%) had a "positive" result in all of the three markers of molecular classification: 14 patients presented with MSI-H, 5 with POLE gene mutation, and 17 with p53 abnormal expression. One case of multiple classifiers was presented. After the integration of molecular classification, a change was observed in the final MDT board decision in 23 cases (35.4%), including six cases of overtreatment and 17 cases of undertreatment, with statistical significance ( Conclusion: The data suggest that the new molecular classification, that is, testing for POLE mutation, MSI, and p53 mutation and for endometrial carcinoma, is a valuable tool for the recurrence risk prognosis and improved planning of adjuvant treatment for EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.