Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737087›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

Americans' support for future pandemic policies: insights from a national survey.

Gillian K SteelFisher, Mary G Findling, Hannah L Caporello, Jazmyne Sutton, Emma Dewhurst, Katherine Evans, Brian C Castrucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gillian K SteelFisherDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Mary G FindlingDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-5239
Hannah L CaporelloDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-4503
Jazmyne SuttonSSRS, Glen Mills, PA 19342, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7743-5051
Emma DewhurstThe de Beaumont Foundation, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7419-5229
Katherine EvansThe de Beaumont Foundation, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.
Brian C CastrucciThe de Beaumont Foundation, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrival of bird flu (H5N1) is a poignant reminder of the need for public health leaders to understand Americans' evolving perspectives on pandemic mitigation policies. To guide response efforts, we conducted a nationally representative opinion survey among 1017 U.S. adults in 2024. Majorities said they would be likely to support each of 4 policies in a future pandemic scenario (related to masking requirements, school closures, restaurant closures, and healthcare worker vaccination requirements). About half (49%) were likely to support all 4 policies, while 32% expressed mixed support. Support varied by gender, age, race, ethnicity, income, metropolitan and parental status, political party, and COVID-specific comorbidities. Roughly 80% expressed concern that future pandemic policies would hurt the economy, be based on political or pharmaceutical company/business interests, pander to critics, or further polarize society. Results suggest public support for future pandemic policies may be wider than media reports suggest, though important divisions exist and concerns about design and implementation are widespread. The most appealing policies will explicitly consider economic impacts and target populations at risk during clear time frames, with scope for personal choice. Ensuring that policies are made without undue political or commercial influence will remain a central challenge for public health leaders.

Indexed as

COVID-19H5N1infectious disease outbreaksmaskspandemicpolarizationpolicypoliticspublic opinionsurveyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID39737087
PMCPMC11683585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.