ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Use of non-specific immunoglobulins in Catalonia in three third-level hospitals: a descriptive analysis of a hospital-prescribed medication registry.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing use of non-specific immunoglobulins (NSIGs) and their current shortage show a need for NSIGs' use prioritization. Data from a clinical perspective are necessary, mainly for pediatric patients. Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the level of clinical evidence (LoE) of the indications that NSIGs are used for, the reasons for discontinuation, and the costs invested. Methods: A retrospective multicentric study was conducted on NSIG incident users between September 2019 and December 2021 retrieved from the Registry of Patients and Treatments (RPT) from Catalonia (Spain). LoE was categorized as A) authorized indications, B) unauthorized with scientific support, C) unauthorized without support, and D) unknown (UNK), following local and the United Kingdom's guidelines as a sensitivity analysis. We also estimated overall spending and costs per patient visit. Results: A total of 400 patients were included (17.3% pediatric), with a mean follow-up of 122.1/person-years for adults. The most frequent indications were nervous system and blood diseases. Almost all pediatric patients (56; 81.2%) were treated under A-level indications, as for 217 (65.6%) adults. In the sensitivity analysis, the A-level usage rate decreased to one-third and the B-level usage rate increased by 2-3 times. Furthermore, 37.8% (151) of individuals discontinued. This was predominantly due to remission or no response. The total costs were 868,462.6€/year, with median spending per visit amounting to 1,500€ for adults and 700€ for pediatric patients. Conclusion: NSIGs are used in clinical practice mainly for approved indications; however, non-approved indications are still an important issue. This could represent a significant economic burden on the healthcare system, focusing on the pediatric population and those at risk for discontinuation with alternative therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.