Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39737021›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024

An assessment of bacterial transmission via rebound tonometry: An

Jonathan Wood, Martyn King, Anita Dutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan WoodPerth Animal Eye Hospital, Manning, Perth, Western Australia.
Martyn KingPerth Animal Eye Hospital, Manning, Perth, Western Australia.
Anita DuttonPerth Animal Eye Hospital, Manning, Perth, Western Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bacterial contamination of medical equipment is a significant risk in both human and veterinary medicine, leading to potential cross-contamination between clinicians, technicians, patients, and healthcare professionals. Pathogens can persist on surfaces, resulting in healthcare-associated infections. Tonometry used to measure intraocular pressure for diagnosing conditions like glaucoma and uveitis, is crucial in both human and veterinary care. However, there is limited information on bacterial transmission through reused tonometer probes in veterinary patients. This pilot study aimed to explore the potential for cross-contamination of bacteria via a rebound tonometer probe using bacterial isolates linked to bacterial ulcerative keratitis in dogs. Aim: To evaluate the potential for bacterial transmission via rebound tonometry using the ICare Methods: Bacterial cultures were inoculated on blood agar and MacConkey agar plates. Tonometer probes were used to perform multiple corneal rebounds (CRs) readings on known bacterial samples, followed by multiple CR readings on agar growth plates, incubation, and re-examination of the agar plates for evidence of bacterial transfer. Controls included plates where the probes were only used on sterile agar. Results: Bacterial transmission was detected with distinct bacterial colonies corresponding to individual CR readings on the plates inoculated with Conclusion: The results indicate that bacterial transmission via rebound tonometer probes is possible. Although this was an

Indexed as

Pseudomonas aeruginosaTonometry, OcularAnimalsCorneal UlcerDog DiseasesDogsEquipment ContaminationPilot ProjectsPseudomonas InfectionsStreptococcusBacteriaContaminationCultureTonometry

Identifiers

PMID39737021
PMCPMC11682756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.