ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Inhibition of biofilm formation and preformed biofilm in
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zinc oxide nanoparticles restore susceptibility to chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn infections.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Genomic and phenotypic analysis of ST25mSphere · 2026Article
- Effects of common disinfectants on biofilm formation and eradication inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Therapeutic strategies against biofilm-associated multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from different sources to biocides: a matter of biofilm.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- α-Bromocinnamaldehyde combats ESKAPE pathogens through dual bactericidal mechanism.Folia microbiologica · 2025Article
- Lytic bacteriophage disrupts biofilm and inhibits growth of pan-drug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The persistence of Methods: Biofilm formation and preformed biofilm were tested by Crystal violet and tetrazolium salt reduction assay, respectively. Analysis of efflux pump (EP) expression during biofilm growth was performed by Real-time RT-PCR assays. Results: CHX and BZK at ¼ and ½ MICs alone or in combination inhibited biofilm growth of Conclusion: These results demonstrate that: (i) CHX and BZK alone or in the presence of RV inhibit biofilm growth and preformed biofilm in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.