ArticleOncology letters2025
Response rates of pazopanib therapy in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma using real‑world data.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of pazopanib efficacy and adverse effects in sarcomas.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Blood-based biomarkers in soft tissue sarcoma: Implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.International journal of cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was a retrospective single-center study. A total of 81 patients diagnosed with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma were included who received pazopanib therapy. Clinical data, including age at diagnosis, histological subtype, treatments received before pazopanib, number of metastatic sites at the time of initiation of treatment, progression-free survival and overall survival time under pazopanib treatment, side effects and response evaluation in follow-up imaging after initiation of pazopanib therapy, were recorded. The 81 patients had 11 different histological subtypes. The synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma groups included 51 patients in total. The median overall survival time in the entire study cohort was 46 months, and the median progression-free survival time was 5 months. The clinical response rate was 46.3%. Patients with hemangioendothelioma and alveolar soft part sarcoma exhibited an improved response to treatment compared with that of patients with other subtypes. Line of therapy and tumor grade were not significantly associated with progression-free survival or clinical response. It was concluded that, regardless of subtype, patients with a low tumor grade and a small number of metastatic sites exhibited an improved response; although the difference in response for patients with a low tumor grade was not significant. In addition, administering the treatment as a second- or third-line therapy appeared to be more appropriate compared with administering it as a later-line therapy; however, this difference was not found to be statistically significant. Therefore, pazopanib should be evaluated as an option for a selected group of patients in whom these factors present together. A further advantage of pazopanib demonstrated was that treatment tolerance was generally good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.