SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Whether hysteroscopy improves fertility outcomes in infertile women: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does the Depth of Hysteroscopic Endometrial Fundal Incision Influence Reproductive Outcomes in Oocyte Recipients? A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Endometrial Polyps and Subfertility in Women Under 40: Pathophysiology, Fertility Outcomes, and Clinical Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Management of uterine leiomyoma and adenomyosis: role of hysteroscopy in diagnosis and norethindrone in the treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Infertility is affecting more and more couples of appropriate age. Hysteroscopy (HSC) has certain effects on the uncompleted pregnancy and live birth caused by uterine microenvironment. Based on the evidence, this paper systematically evaluates the effectiveness and safety of HSC intervention on the fertility outcome of female infertility. Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTS) of hysteroscopy intervention in female infertility were included in the literature database. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to December 10, 2022. RevMan 5.4 software was used for statistical analysis to study the effects of HSC on clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and abortion rate. Results: A total of 14 RCTS were included. Five studies evaluated the effect of HSC on live birth rate, and HSC had an overall positive effect on live birth rate. Fourteen studies evaluated the effect of HSC on clinical pregnancy rates, and preoperative HSC was associated with significant improvements in pregnancy rates for both first-time IVF/ICSI patients and repeat IVF/ICSI patients. Eight studies showed no significant difference in the effect of HSC on miscarriage rates. Conclusion: As a visual examination/treatment technique, HSC can improve the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in most studies, while the risk of abortion is within the acceptable range, and can be used as a recommended examination method for infertile women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.