Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736805›Full record

ReviewVascular specialist international2024

Techniques of Oncovascular Reconstruction of Portal and Mesenteric Veins during Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery.

Ahram Han, Sanghyun Ahn, Seung-Kee Min

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular specialist international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Selection and Prognosis of Different Venous Reconstruction Methods in Laparoscopic Pancreatectomy].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahram HanDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3866-5214
Sanghyun AhnDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-4788
Seung-Kee MinDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-2562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major vessel invasion, particularly involving the portal and superior mesenteric veins, poses significant challenges during the radical resection of hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers. Oncovascular surgery is essential for curative outcomes, and often requires portomesenteric vein reconstruction. Techniques, such as lateral venorrhaphy, patch repair, end-to-end anastomosis, and interposition grafting, have been employed. Autogenous veins such as the internal jugular, left renal, external iliac, or femoral veins are options, although not always available. Alternatives include great saphenous vein grafts, other autogenous materials, including the parietal peritoneum, bovine patches and allografts. Despite the higher risks of infection and thrombosis, prosthetic grafts are also considered. Ensuring long-term patency through meticulous surgical techniques is crucial for preventing complications, such as thrombosis and variceal bleeding.

Indexed as

Hepatobiliary cancerOncovascular surgeryPortal veinVein reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID39736805
PMCPMC11685380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.