ArticleJournal of medical case reports2024
Ipsilateral ectopic pregnancy in the distal remaining part of the previously removed Fallopian tube: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEctopic pregnancy, occurring outside the uterine cavity, poses a significant health risk, with Fallopian tube involvement being predominant. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy, particularly in the ipsilateral remnant of a previously removed tube, is a rare and poorly understood phenomenon. Here, we present a case of recurrent ectopic pregnancy occurring in the distal remnant of the right fallopian tube following ipsilateral incomplete salpingectomy in a 22-year-old woman. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old woman of mixed Arab ancestry and African ethnicity, gravida 4, para 1, with a history of one miscarriage and a previous ectopic pregnancy, presented to Elshatby Maternity Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt, complaining of severe lower abdominal pain with a history of an open right salpingectomy one year prior due to the ectopic pregnancy. She exhibited stable vital signs on admission. Ultrasound revealed a 6-week gestational sac in the right fallopian tube, accompanied by hematoma and mild pelvic collection. Despite analgesic interventions, her symptoms worsened the next day, prompting open surgery. Surprisingly, the distal portion of the right tube, which was supposed to have been removed in the prior salpingectomy, contained the ectopic pregnancy. A laparotomy was performed, involving evacuation of the pelvic hematoma, distal ipsilateral tubal salpingectomy, and peritoneal lavage. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with improvement demonstrated during follow-up.
conclusionCaution should be taken when dealing with any woman in the reproductive age group who presents with acute abdomen, especially if she has a previous history of ectopic pregnancy, to exclude the possibility of recurrent ectopic pregnancy. Previous salpingectomy does not exclude the possibility of recurrent ectopic pregnancy on the ipsilateral side, as the inappropriate surgical technique used during salpingectomy can affect the possibility of recurrence. We suggest that careful clinical consideration of the surgical technique used during salpingectomy is essential to minimize the risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancies and prevent serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.