Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736796›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

Predicting local control of brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy with clinical, radiomics and deep learning features.

Hemalatha Kanakarajan, Wouter De Baene, Patrick Hanssens, Margriet Sitskoorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hemalatha KanakarajanDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. H.Kanakarajan@tilburguniversity.edu.
Wouter De BaeneDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. w.debaene@tilburguniversity.edu.
Patrick HanssensGamma Knife Center, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Margriet SitskoornDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTimely identification of local failure after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases allows for treatment modifications, potentially improving outcomes. While previous studies showed that adding radiomics or Deep Learning (DL) features to clinical features increased Local Control (LC) prediction accuracy, their combined potential to predict LC remains unexplored. We examined whether a model using a combination of radiomics, DL and clinical features achieves better accuracy than models using only a subset of these features. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected pre-treatment brain MRIs (TR/TE: 25/1.86 ms, FOV: 210 × 210 × 150, flip angle: 30°, transverse slice orientation, voxel size: 0.82 × 0.82 × 1.5 mm) and clinical data for 129 patients at the Gamma Knife Center of the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital. Radiomics features were extracted using the Python radiomics feature extractor and DL features were obtained using a 3D ResNet model. A Random Forest machine learning algorithm was employed to train four models using: (1) clinical features only; (2) clinical and radiomics features; (3) clinical and DL features; and (4) clinical, radiomics, and DL features. The average accuracy and other metrics were derived using K-fold cross validation.

resultsThe prediction model utilizing only clinical variables provided an Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.85 and an accuracy of 75.0%. Adding radiomics features increased the AUC to 0.86 and accuracy to 79.33%, while adding DL features resulted in an AUC of 0.82 and accuracy of 78.0%. The best performance came from combining clinical, radiomics, and DL features, achieving an AUC of 0.88 and accuracy of 81.66%. This model's prediction improvement was statistically significant compared to models trained with clinical features alone or with the combination of clinical and DL features. However, the improvement was not statistically significant when compared to the model trained with clinical and radiomics features.

conclusionIntegrating radiomics and DL features with clinical characteristics improves prediction of local control after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Models incorporating radiomics features consistently outperformed those utilizing clinical features alone or clinical and DL features. The increased prediction accuracy of our integrated model demonstrates the potential for early outcome prediction, enabling timely treatment modifications to improve patient management.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesBrain metastasesDeep learningLocal controlRadiomicsStereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39736796
PMCPMC11684244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.