ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024
Predicting local control of brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy with clinical, radiomics and deep learning features.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain metastases in lung cancer patients: Correlation between radiologic phenotypes and outcome parameters in neurosurgically treated cohort.The neuroradiology journal · 2026Article
- Predicting early response to ablative radiotherapy in oligometastatic disease: a scoping review of radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning models.European radiology · 2026Article
- Radiomics using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and clinical features for predicting response to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A multicenter study of automatic segmentation-based multimodal fusion integrating radiomics, deep learning, and clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Prediction of local failure after stereotactic radiotherapy in melanoma brain metastases using ensemble learning on clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic data.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Mechanisms, Imaging Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Advances of Neovascularization in Brain Metastases.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- AI-assisted segmentation-based fusion model integrating deep learning, radiomics, and clinical parameters for identifying coronary heart disease risk in patients with MAFLD.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic hybrid intelligence with neural and knowledge-based expert reasoning for SRS: an AI model for breast cancer brain metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of HyperArc stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer brain metastasis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTimely identification of local failure after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases allows for treatment modifications, potentially improving outcomes. While previous studies showed that adding radiomics or Deep Learning (DL) features to clinical features increased Local Control (LC) prediction accuracy, their combined potential to predict LC remains unexplored. We examined whether a model using a combination of radiomics, DL and clinical features achieves better accuracy than models using only a subset of these features. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe collected pre-treatment brain MRIs (TR/TE: 25/1.86 ms, FOV: 210 × 210 × 150, flip angle: 30°, transverse slice orientation, voxel size: 0.82 × 0.82 × 1.5 mm) and clinical data for 129 patients at the Gamma Knife Center of the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital. Radiomics features were extracted using the Python radiomics feature extractor and DL features were obtained using a 3D ResNet model. A Random Forest machine learning algorithm was employed to train four models using: (1) clinical features only; (2) clinical and radiomics features; (3) clinical and DL features; and (4) clinical, radiomics, and DL features. The average accuracy and other metrics were derived using K-fold cross validation.
resultsThe prediction model utilizing only clinical variables provided an Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.85 and an accuracy of 75.0%. Adding radiomics features increased the AUC to 0.86 and accuracy to 79.33%, while adding DL features resulted in an AUC of 0.82 and accuracy of 78.0%. The best performance came from combining clinical, radiomics, and DL features, achieving an AUC of 0.88 and accuracy of 81.66%. This model's prediction improvement was statistically significant compared to models trained with clinical features alone or with the combination of clinical and DL features. However, the improvement was not statistically significant when compared to the model trained with clinical and radiomics features.
conclusionIntegrating radiomics and DL features with clinical characteristics improves prediction of local control after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Models incorporating radiomics features consistently outperformed those utilizing clinical features alone or clinical and DL features. The increased prediction accuracy of our integrated model demonstrates the potential for early outcome prediction, enabling timely treatment modifications to improve patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.