Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736795›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Insights into the biology and insecticide susceptibility of the secondary malaria vector Anopheles parensis in an area with long-term use of insecticide-treated nets in northwestern Tanzania.

Salum Abdallah Mapua, Ismail Hassan Nambunga, Joel Ouma Odero, Gustav Mkandawile, John Paliga Masalu, Najat Feruz Kahamba, Emmanuel Elirehema Hape, Nancy Stephen Matowo, Frederic Tripet, Fredros Oketch Okumu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salum Abdallah Mapua *Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania. smapua@ihi.or.tz.
Ismail Hassan Nambunga *Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Joel Ouma Odero *Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Gustav MkandawileEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
John Paliga MasaluEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Najat Feruz KahambaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Emmanuel Elirehema HapeEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Nancy Stephen MatowoDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Frederic TripetSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzgasse 2, 4123, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Fredros Oketch OkumuEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-002138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Anopheles funestus group includes at least 11 sibling species, with Anopheles funestus Giles being the most studied and significant malaria vector. Other species, like Anopheles parensis, are understudied despite their potential role in transmission. This article provides insights into the biology and insecticide susceptibility of An. parensis, with observations of its densities in northwestern Tanzania.

methodsMosquitoes were collected in three villages in Misungwi district, northwestern Tanzania, using CDC light traps and battery-powered aspirators indoors and human-baited double net traps outdoors. Female Anopheles adults were morphologically sorted and identified by PCR, and a subset was tested by ELISA for vertebrate blood meal sources and Plasmodium sporozoite infections. Insecticide susceptibility was assessed using the WHO protocol (2nd edition, 2018). Unfed females were dissected to assess parity, gonotrophic status and insemination status, while blood-fed females were monitored for oviposition to estimate egg counts. The prevalence of An. parensis was generally < 24% across all sites, except in Ngaya village, where it unexpectedly constituted 84% of PCR-amplified An. funestus sensu lato. This species was present in both indoor and outdoor collections, yet the females exclusively fed on non-human vertebrates, with no human blood meals detected. Parity rates were approximately 49% for resting and 46% for host-seeking females, with slightly higher percentages of both parous and inseminated females in the dry season compared to the wet season. Most parous females had oviposited once or twice, with those in the dry season ovipositing significantly more eggs. The average wing length of female An. parensis was 2.93 mm, and there was no significant impact of body size on parity, fecundity or insemination. The An. parensis mosquitoes were fully susceptible to pyrethroids, carbamates, organophosphates and organochlorides.

resultsThe prevalence of An. parensis was generally < 24% across all sites, except in Ngaya village, where it unexpectedly constituted 84% of PCR-amplified An. funestus sensu lato. This species was present in both indoor and outdoor collections, yet the females exclusively fed on non-human vertebrates, with no human blood meals detected. Parity rates were approximately 49% for resting and 46% for host-seeking females, with slightly higher percentages of both parous and inseminated females in the dry season compared to the wet season. Most parous females had oviposited once or twice, with those in the dry season ovipositing significantly more eggs. The average wing length of female An. parensis was 2.93 mm, and there was no significant impact of body size on parity, fecundity or insemination. The An. parensis mosquitoes were fully susceptible to pyrethroids, carbamates, organophosphates and organochlorides..

conclusionThis study offers insights into the behaviours and insecticide susceptibility of An. parensis. Primarily feeding on non-human hosts, An. parensis is less significant in malaria transmission than more anthropophilic vectors. Unlike the pyrethroid-resistant An. funestus sensu stricto, An. parensis remains fully susceptible to public health insecticides despite the use of insecticidal bed nets. These findings provide a foundation for future research and may inform control strategies targeting residual malaria transmission involving An. parensis.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito VectorsAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInsecticide ResistanceMosquito ControlTanzaniaInsecticidesAnopheles parensisMalariaPlasmodium sppTanzania

Identifiers

PMID39736795
PMCPMC11687015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.