ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2024
Geographic variation in modern contraceptive utilization among women of reproductive age in Mozambique: a multilevel analysis.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Policy in practice: assessing Senegal's family planning progress using a mixed-methods approach.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Correction: Geographic variation in modern contraceptive utilization among women of reproductive age in Mozambique: a multilevel analysis.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Pooled prevalence of modern contraceptive utilization and its associated factors among reproductive age women in East Africa: derived from demographic and health surveys.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- The effect of contraceptive empowerment during pregnancy on postpartum family planning use in Ethiopia: evidence from a longitudinal panel study.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern contraceptives are crucial for reducing maternal and child mortality, yet Mozambique's contraceptive prevalence rate is very low, with significant regional disparities. This study investigates geographic variation in contraceptive use and the individual, community, and regional factors influencing it to guide equitable family planning interventions.
methodsThis study utilized data from the 2022/23 Mozambique Demographic and Health Survey, analyzing a weighted sample of 9,316 women aged 15-49. The outcome variable was modern contraceptive use, with predictors including individual factors such as age, education, wealth, and marital status, as well as community-level factors like residence and region. Data analysis was conducted using Stata 17 and ArcGIS 10.7, employing multilevel logistic regression and spatial techniques (Global Moran's I, Getis-Ord Gi*, interpolation, and SaTScan) to identify patterns and geographic clusters of contraceptive use.
resultsThe study found a modern contraceptive prevalence of 34.8% (95% CI: 33.84-35.78). Key factors influencing usage included age, education, wealth, and healthcare access. Women aged 25-34 were 31% more likely to use contraceptives than those aged 15-24 (AOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.13-1.53). Secondary education more than doubled the likelihood (AOR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.82-2.78), and wealthier women had a 74% higher likelihood (AOR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.39-2.17). Fieldworker visits increased usage by 38% (AOR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.15-1.64). Regional disparities were significant, with women in Cabo Delgado 81% (AOR: 0.19 95% CI: 0.14, 0.27) less likely to use contraceptives compared to Maputo. Higher usage was concentrated in Maputo and Southeastern Gaza. Spatial analysis revealed significant regional disparities, with hotspots in Maputo and Gaza, where women are 2.52 times more likely to use contraceptives, while rural areas like Cabo Delgado lag behind.
conclusionModern contraceptive use in Mozambique remains low, with regional disparities. Key factors influencing use include age, education, wealth, and healthcare access. Older, educated, and wealthier women are more likely to use contraception. Media exposure and proximity to healthcare facilities also play a role. Regional differences persist, with lower usage in provinces like Cabo Delgado and higher usage in urban areas like Maputo and Gaza. Targeted interventions are necessary to address these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.