ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024
A novel social-network-analysis-based approach for analyzing complex network of actors involved in accessibility of anti-cancer medications in Iran.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe access to anti-cancer medications is influenced by policies formed via the convergence of various stakeholders. The aim of this study is to identify and analyse the stakeholders involved in formulating and implementing policies related to the accessibility of anti-cancer medications in Iran and their interactions that are relevant to the outcomes of these policies for the first time.
methodsTo achieve the objectives, a novel multistage social network analysis (SNA)-based approach that includes three phases is proposed. First, the actors were identified by a team consisting of multidisciplinary knowledgeable experts through 15 comprehensive interviews. Then, the influence relationships of these actors were comprehensively analysed through in-depth interviews with nine key informants involved in pharmaceutical policies through a structured questionnaire. Finally, a novel network of actors was determined accordingly, and a SNA-based approach proposed to reveal the intrinsic roles and various aspects of the importance of the network's actors.
resultsThe study identified a total of 45 actors, which were then classified into 4 categories on the basis of their public or private nature and their foreign or domestic origin. This established network helped in creating a comprehensive view of the main actors, and can help policymakers to solve the problems related to access to anti-cancer medications more effectively and prevent the creation of these problems in the future. In this way, the network identified specific actors that can benefit from increased attention and dialogue. The computational results revealed that the Iran Food and Drug Administration (IFDA), Pharmaceutical Importer Companies (PharIc) and Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Companies (PharMC) were highly important actors in terms of their connectivity to other actors. Additionally, law enforcement agencies (LEA) have shown limited effectiveness within this network.
conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of complex relationships among various actors and proposes a novel SNA-based approach to analyse them. Regarding the main steps of the proposed approach and the findings, it is imperative for pharmaceutical policy plans to involve a diverse group of experts from the beginning, prioritizing the preferences of stakeholders, and providing a patient-centred approach to prevent the worsening of resource shortages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.