Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736739›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Development and validation of the Chinese patient-centered integrated care scale.

Yue Yin, Wenqing Gao, Xiujuan Cui, Wenxi Tang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue Yin *Department of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Wenqing Gao *Department of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Xiujuan CuiDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Wenxi TangDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China. tokammy@cpu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72174207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe healthcare system is currently facing challenges in transitioning to a more integrated, patient-centered care. China has implemented various practical exploration and pilot programs in developing an integrated healthcare service system. However, there remains an absence of appropriate instrument to assess integrated care from the patient's perspective, particularly one that aligns with China's national conditions.

methodsUsing a literature review, Delphi methods, a pilot study involving 171 chronic patients in Guangdong Province, and the analytic hierarchy process, we developed and validated the Chinese Patient-Centered Integrated Care (CPCIC) with a weighting system.

resultsThe results of exploratory factor analysis indicated CPCIC scale had robust structural validity. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.868, signifying excellent internal consistency. The final scale included four first-level indicators (dimensions): services responsiveness, services convenience, services continuity and services coordination and 14 s-level indicators (items). The assigned weights of these dimensions were 0.1070, 0.2926, 0.4155 and 0.1849, respectively.

conclusionsThe four-dimension, 14-item CPCIC scale with a weighting system was successfully developed and validated. The scale provides a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating the degree of integrated care from the patient's perspective, and has potential applications in informing the reform of China's healthcare system to enhance patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDelphi TechniquePatient-Centered CarePsychometricsAdultAgedChinaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalytic hierarchy processDelphi methodInstrumentIntegrated careValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID39736739
PMCPMC11687146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.