Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736687›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

An artificial intelligence application to predict prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation among patients with critical orthopaedic trauma: an establishment and validation study.

Weigang Jiang, Tao Liu, Baisheng Sun, Lixia Zhong, Zhencan Han, Minhua Lu, Mingxing Lei

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weigang JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou City, 215000, Jiang Su Province, People's Republic of China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The 9 th Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Baisheng SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lixia ZhongDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhencan HanDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Minhua LuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou City, 215000, Jiang Su Province, People's Republic of China. lmh910307@126.com.
Mingxing LeiDepartment of Orthopedics, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Hainan, China. leimingxing2@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged dependence on mechanical ventilation is a common occurrence in clinical ICU patients and presents significant challenges for patient care and resource allocation. Predicting prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation is crucial for improving patient outcomes, preventing ventilator-associated complications, and guiding targeted clinical interventions. However, specific tools for predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation among ICU patients, particularly those with critical orthopaedic trauma, are currently lacking. The purpose of the study was to establish and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) platform to assess the prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation among patients with critical orthopaedic trauma.

methodsThis study analyzed 1400 patients with critical orthopaedic trauma who received mechanical ventilation, and the prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation was defined as not weaning from mechanical ventilation for ≧ 7 days. Patients were randomly classified into a training cohort and a validation cohort based on the ratio of 8:2. Patients in the training cohort were used to establish models using machine learning techniques, including logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting machine (eXGBM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), whereas patients in the validation cohort were used to validate these models. The prediction performance of these models was evaluated using discrimination and calibration. A scoring system was used to comprehensively assess and compare the prediction performance of the models, based on ten evaluation metrics. External validation of the model was performed in 122 patients with critical orthopaedic trauma from a university teaching hospital. Furthermore, the optimal model was deployed as an AI calculator, which was accessible online, to assess the risk of prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation.

resultsAmong the developed models, the eXGBM model had the highest score of 50, followed by the LightGBM model (48) and the RF model (37). In detail, the eXGBM model outperformed other models in terms of recall (0.892), Brier score (0.088), log loss (0.291), and calibration slope (0.999), and the model was the second best in terms of area under the curve value (0.949, 95%: 0.933-0.961), accuracy (0.871), F1 score (0.873), and discrimination slope (0.647). The SHAP revealed that the most important five features were respiratory rate, lower limb fracture, glucose, PaO2, and PaCO2. External validation of the eXGBM model also demonstrated favorable prediction performance, with an AUC value of 0.893 (95%CI: 0.819-0.967). The eXGBM model was successfully deployed as an AI platform, which was at https://prolongedmechanicalventilation-lqsfm6ecky6dpd4ybkvohu.streamlit.app/ . By simply clicking the link and inputting features, users were able to obtain the risk of experiencing prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation for individuals. Based on the risk of prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation, patients were stratified into the high-risk or the low-risk groups, and corresponding therapeutic interventions were recommended, accordingly.

conclusionsThe AI model shows potential as a valuable tool for stratifying patients with a high risk of prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation. The AI model may offer a promising approach for optimizing patient care and resource allocation in critical care settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRespiration, ArtificialAdultAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSupport Vector MachineTime FactorsA comprehensive evaluation systemArtificial intelligenceCritical orthopaedic traumaMachine learningMechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID39736687
PMCPMC11684237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.