SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Comparative efficacy and safety of pulmonary surfactant delivery strategies in neonatal RDS: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Overview of the Effectiveness of Different Surfactant Administration Methods: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Pooled it
- Vibrating mesh nebulizers vs. less invasive surfactant administration in the treatment of preterm respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter, open-label, exploratory, randomized clinical trial.European journal of medical research · 2025Trial
- Surfactant administration in late preterm and term neonates: is LISA ready for routine use?European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Comparison of LISA and INSURE techniques for surfactant administration: a multicentre retrospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictors of Mortality in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A three-factor nomogram predicts the use of invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 h in preterm infants.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Neonatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Fresh Look.Neonatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare five pulmonary surfactant (PS) administration strategies for neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), including intubation-surfactant-extubation (InSurE), thin catheter administration, laryngeal mask airway (LMA), surfactant nebulization (SN), and usual care, with a particular emphasis on the comparison of the LMA and SN with other strategies.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to November 2023. Two authors independently conducted data extraction, and assessed bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Frequency-based random-effects network meta-analyses were executed.
resultsA total of 36 trials and 4035 infants were included in the analysis. LMA (OR: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.09 to 0.42) and Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) (OR: 0.17, 95%CI: 0.09 to 0.32) significantly reduced intubation rates compared to usual care. SN had a higher intubation rate compared to LISA (OR: 3.36, 95%CI: 1.46 to 7.71) and LMA (OR: 2.92, 95%CI: 1.10 to 7.71). LMA had a higher incidence of BPD compared to LISA (OR: 2.59, 95%CI: 1.21 to 5.54). SN ranked second to LISA in preventing BPD and death, but its efficacy decreased after excluding high-risk studies. SN and LMA had the lowest incidence of adverse events during administration.SN had the highest likelihood of secondary administration. Most results were rated as low or very low quality, with findings related to SN significantly impacted by high-risk trials.
conclusionsThe thin catheter strategy minimized intubation risk and showed a better composite effect in reducing both mortality and BPD incidence. SN and LMA each showed safety and some clinical benefits in the subpopulations where they were studied, but their efficacy needs further validation through high-quality studies. REGISTRATION: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023463756).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.