Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736677›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Dynamic assessment of signal entropy for prognostication and secondary brain insult detection after traumatic brain injury.

Stefan Yu Bögli, Ihsane Olakorede, Erta Beqiri, Xuhang Chen, Ari Ercole, Peter Hutchinson, Peter Smielewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan Yu BögliBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. stefanyu.boegli@usz.ch.
Ihsane OlakoredeBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Erta BeqiriBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Xuhang ChenBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ari ErcoleDivision of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter HutchinsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter SmielewskiBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR N013433-1Swiss National Science Foundation 210839/225270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEntropy quantifies the level of disorder within a system. Low entropy reflects increased rigidity of homeostatic feedback systems possibly reflecting failure of protective physiological mechanisms like cerebral autoregulation. In traumatic brain injury (TBI), low entropy of heart rate and intracranial pressure (ICP) predict unfavorable outcome. Based on the hypothesis that entropy is a dynamically changing process, we explored the origin and value of entropy time trends.

methods232 continuous recordings of arterial blood pressure and ICP of TBI patients with available clinical information and 6-month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale) were accessed form the Brain Physics database. Biosignal entropy was estimated as multiscale entropy (MSE) that aggregates entropy at several time scales (20 coarse graining steps starting from 0.1 Hz). MSE was calculated repeatedly for consecutive, overlapping 6 h segments. Percentage monitoring time (ptime) or dosage (duration*level/hour) below different cutoffs were evaluated against outcome using univariable and multivariable analyses, and propensity score matching. Associations to clinical and monitoring metrics were explored using correlation coefficients. Lastly, individual secondary brain insults (deviations in ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure - CPP, or pressure reactivity) were assessed in relation to changes in MSE.

resultsIncreased MSE abp and MSE cpp ptime (OR 1.28 (1.07-1.58) and OR 1.50 (1.16-2.03) for MSE abp and cpp respectively) and dose (OR 1.12 (1.02-1.27) and OR 1.21 (1.06-1.46) for MSE abp and cpp respectively) were associated with poor outcome even after propensity score matching within multivariable models correcting for ICP, CPP, and the pressure reactivity index. MSE trajectories differed significantly dependent on outcome. The entropy metrics displayed weak correlations to clinical parameters. Individual episodes of deranged physiology were associated with decreases in the MSE metrics from both cerebral and systemic biosignals.

conclusionsBiosignal entropy of changes dynamically after TBI. The assessment of these variations augments individualized, dynamic, outcome prognostication and identification of secondary cerebral insults. Additionally, these explorations allow for further exploitation of the extensive physiological data lakes acquired for each TBI patient within an intensive care environment.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEntropyIntracranial PressureAdultAgedFemaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPrognosisComplexityEntropyMultimodality monitoringTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39736677
PMCPMC11684064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.