ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024
Dynamic assessment of signal entropy for prognostication and secondary brain insult detection after traumatic brain injury.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on autonomic nervous system activity and its interaction with cerebrovascular reactivity - an experimental study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Four Distinct Dynamic Intracranial Pressure Trajectories and Their Prognostic Implications in Acute Brain Injury: A Multicenter Cohort Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- The lower limit margin: a determinant of autoregulatory sensitivity to changes in cerebral perfusion pressure.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Physiological Signal Entropy in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Looking Beyond the Obvious: A STARSHIP Study.Critical care explorations · 2025Observational
- Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity risk modeling based on transients in time series describing the autonomic nervous system and cerebral hemodynamics.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Cerebral perfusion pressure targets after traumatic brain injury: a reappraisal.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- AI-Driven Prediction of Glasgow Coma Scale Outcomes in Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of high-resolution multimodality neuromonitoring for traumatic brain injury management: lessons and insights from cases, events, and patterns.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEntropy quantifies the level of disorder within a system. Low entropy reflects increased rigidity of homeostatic feedback systems possibly reflecting failure of protective physiological mechanisms like cerebral autoregulation. In traumatic brain injury (TBI), low entropy of heart rate and intracranial pressure (ICP) predict unfavorable outcome. Based on the hypothesis that entropy is a dynamically changing process, we explored the origin and value of entropy time trends.
methods232 continuous recordings of arterial blood pressure and ICP of TBI patients with available clinical information and 6-month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale) were accessed form the Brain Physics database. Biosignal entropy was estimated as multiscale entropy (MSE) that aggregates entropy at several time scales (20 coarse graining steps starting from 0.1 Hz). MSE was calculated repeatedly for consecutive, overlapping 6 h segments. Percentage monitoring time (ptime) or dosage (duration*level/hour) below different cutoffs were evaluated against outcome using univariable and multivariable analyses, and propensity score matching. Associations to clinical and monitoring metrics were explored using correlation coefficients. Lastly, individual secondary brain insults (deviations in ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure - CPP, or pressure reactivity) were assessed in relation to changes in MSE.
resultsIncreased MSE abp and MSE cpp ptime (OR 1.28 (1.07-1.58) and OR 1.50 (1.16-2.03) for MSE abp and cpp respectively) and dose (OR 1.12 (1.02-1.27) and OR 1.21 (1.06-1.46) for MSE abp and cpp respectively) were associated with poor outcome even after propensity score matching within multivariable models correcting for ICP, CPP, and the pressure reactivity index. MSE trajectories differed significantly dependent on outcome. The entropy metrics displayed weak correlations to clinical parameters. Individual episodes of deranged physiology were associated with decreases in the MSE metrics from both cerebral and systemic biosignals.
conclusionsBiosignal entropy of changes dynamically after TBI. The assessment of these variations augments individualized, dynamic, outcome prognostication and identification of secondary cerebral insults. Additionally, these explorations allow for further exploitation of the extensive physiological data lakes acquired for each TBI patient within an intensive care environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.