ArticleBMC public health2024
Perception of antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance among faculty and staff in a medical school: insights from a mixed mode survey in Bahrain.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding awareness of antibiotics is crucial in identifying the attitudes of people which could subsequently help shape campaigns and policies addressing this problem. The study aimed to explore awareness of antibiotics use and antibiotic resistance among faculty and staff at the medical institution. METHODOLOGY: All the study participants (faculty & staff) were asked to complete the survey. The survey consisted of questions ranging from knowledge and use of antibiotics to knowledge about antibiotic resistance. Ninety participants responded for the quantitative survey. After the questionnaire administration, in-depth interviews were conducted with subgroups of faculty, technicians, and administrative staff. The researchers employed a purposive sampling strategy. Around 43 participants volunteered to participate in this interview.
resultsThe results showed that 92% of participants reported taking antibiotics, with the majority receiving them from licensed medical providers, while a smaller respondent (12.6%) self-medicated. The concept of "antibiotic resistance" was the most widely recognized, with 47.78% of participants indicating awareness, typically gained from healthcare personnel. The in-depth interviews revealed that the faculty group had the strongest basic knowledge about antibiotics and resistance. When it comes to consequences of ABR, participants mentioned the risk of repeated infection and spread of stronger strains of bacteria that might be difficult to treat soon. The most important suggestion provided by most participants was that the antibiotics should be taken only with a doctor's prescription and consumed for appropriate duration as suggested by the doctor.
conclusionsAlthough the study revealed a strong understanding of antibiotics, awareness regarding antibiotic resistance remained low. The findings emphasize the importance of enhancing communication skills among health professionals and implementing stewardship programs to promote safe antibiotic use and raise awareness about antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.