Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736627›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2024

Distinct regulation of Tau Monomer and aggregate uptake and intracellular accumulation in human neurons.

Amir T Marvian, Tabea Strauss, Qilin Tang, Benjamin J Tuck, Sophie Keeling, Daniel Rüdiger, Negar Mirzazadeh Dizaji, Hossein Mohammad-Beigi, Brigitte Nuscher, Pijush Chakraborty and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Amir T MarvianDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. A.Tayaranian@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1266-2370
Tabea StraussGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (LMU), Klinikum, Germany.
Qilin TangGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (LMU), Klinikum, Germany.
Benjamin J TuckUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sophie KeelingUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Daniel RüdigerDepartment of Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Negar Mirzazadeh DizajiFaculty for Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstr. 5-13, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Hossein Mohammad-BeigiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.
Brigitte NuscherDivision of Metabolic Biochemistry, Biomedical Center (BMC), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Pijush ChakrabortyDepartment for NMR-based Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, 37077, Gӧttingen, Germany.
Duncan S SutherlandInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Centre (iNANO), Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
William A McEwanUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas KöglspergerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Stefan ZahlerDepartment of Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Markus ZweckstetterDepartment for NMR-based Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, 37077, Gӧttingen, Germany.
Stefan F LichtenthalerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (LMU), Klinikum, Germany.
Wolfgang WurstGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (LMU), Klinikum, Germany.
Sigrid SchwarzGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (LMU), Klinikum, Germany.
Günter HöglingerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (LMU), Klinikum, Germany. Guenter.Hoeglinger@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prion-like spreading of Tau pathology is the leading cause of disease progression in various tauopathies. A critical step in propagating pathologic Tau in the brain is the transport from the extracellular environment and accumulation inside naïve neurons. Current research indicates that human neurons internalize both the physiological extracellular Tau (eTau) monomers and the pathological eTau aggregates. However, similarities or differences in neuronal transport mechanisms between Tau species remain elusive.

methodMonomers, oligomers, and fibrils of recombinant 2N4R Tau were produced and characterized by biochemical and biophysical methods. A neuronal eTau uptake and accumulation assay was developed for human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons (iPSCNs) and Lund human mesencephalic cells (LUHMES)-derived neurons. Mechanisms of uptake and cellular accumulation of eTau species were studied by using small molecule inhibitors of endocytic mechanisms and siRNAs targeting Tau uptake mediators.

resultsExtracellular Tau aggregates accumulated more than monomers in human neurons, mainly due to the higher efficiency of small fibrillar and soluble oligomeric aggregates in intraneuronal accumulation. A competition assay revealed a distinction in the neuronal accumulation between physiological eTau Monomers and pathology-relevant aggregates, suggesting differential transport mechanisms. Blocking heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) with heparin only inhibited the accumulation of eTau aggregates, whereas monomers' uptake remained unaltered. At the molecular level, the downregulation of genes involved in HSPG synthesis exclusively blocked neuronal accumulation of eTau aggregates but not monomers, suggesting its role in the transport of pathologic Tau. Moreover, the knockdown of LRP1, as a receptor of Tau, mainly reduced the accumulation of monomeric form, confirming its involvement in Tau's physiological transport.

conclusionThese data propose that despite the similarity in the cellular mechanism, the uptake and accumulation of eTau Monomers and aggregates in human neurons are regulated by different molecular mediators. Thus, they address the possibility of targeting the pathological spreading of Tau aggregates without disturbing the probable physiological or non-pathogenic transport of Tau Monomers.

Indexed as

Neuronstau ProteinsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsProtein AggregatesTauopathiesMAPT protein, humanProtein Aggregatestau ProteinsCell-to-cell spreadingExtracellular TauHSPGsLRP1NeurodegenerationUptakeVPS35

Identifiers

PMID39736627
PMCPMC11686972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.