Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736623›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Interpretable machine learning model for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer: integrating intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics with clinical and metabolic features.

Wenjun Zhao, Mengyan Hou, Juan Wang, Dan Song, Yongchao Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenjun ZhaoDepartment of MRI, Xinxiang Central Hospital (The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University), 56 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang, Henan, 453000, China. 594861640@qq.com.
Mengyan HouDepartment of MRI, Xinxiang Central Hospital (The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University), 56 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang, Henan, 453000, China.
Juan WangDepartment of MRI, Xinxiang Central Hospital (The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University), 56 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang, Henan, 453000, China.
Dan SongDepartment of MRI, Xinxiang Central Hospital (The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University), 56 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang, Henan, 453000, China.
Yongchao NiuDepartment of MRI, Xinxiang Central Hospital (The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University), 56 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang, Henan, 453000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model based on intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics combined with clinicoradiological features and metabolic information from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) and avoid unnecessary biopsies.

methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 350 patients with suspicious prostate lesions from our institution who underwent 3.0 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) prior to biopsy (training set, n = 191, testing set, n = 83, and a temporal validation set, n = 76). Intratumoral and peritumoral volumes of interest (VOI

resultsA total of 350 patients were included, comprising 173 patients with csPCa (49.4%) and 177 patients with non-csPCa (50.6%). The intra-rad-score and peri-rad-score were constructed via 10 and 16 radiomic features. The combined model demonstrated the highest AUC, accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity in the testing set (0.968, 0.928, 0.927, 0.932, and 0.923, respectively) and in the temporal validation set (0.940, 0.895, 0.890, 0.923, and 0.875, respectively). SHAP analysis revealed that the intra-rad-score, PSAD, peri-rad-score, and PI-RADS score were the most important predictors of the combined model.

conclusionWe developed and validated a robust machine learning model incorporating intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features, along with clinicoradiological and metabolic parameters, to accurately identify csPCa. The prediction process was visualized via SHAP analysis to facilitate clinical decision- making.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesInterpretabilityMachine learningProstate cancerRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39736623
PMCPMC11684284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.