ArticleBMC nursing2024
Focus group-supported development and psychometric exploration of an instrument to assess perceived physical exertion in nursing students.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05817396 (Take Care! - Dissemination Von Bewegungsbezogener Gesundheitskompetenz in Der Pflegeausbildung), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Take Care! - Dissemination Von Bewegungsbezogener Gesundheitskompetenz in Der Pflegeausbildung
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe physical demands of nurses during their work and education are high. In addition, shortage in nursing staff increases the individual workload. However, an appropriate tool to measure perceived physical exertion in nursing students is missing. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to design a questionnaire to assess perceived physical exertion in nursing students during their vocational education and to explore its factor structure.
methodsWe initially conducted two parallel semi-structured focus group interviews with purposefully sampled nursing students to gain insights into their daily physical load. We coded the material and derived an initial set of 35 items (work-related and school-related). Subsequently, we conducted another semi-structured focus group interview with purposefully sampled nursing students of another school to cross-validate the items and refine the preliminary questionnaire according to their responses. To check the psychometric quality and factor structure of the questionnaire, we used data of 237 nursing students from 16 different nursing schools. We analyzed the items (n = 30) descriptively (including internal consistency via Cronbach's α) and examined the structure of the questionnaire using exploratory factor analyses.
resultsIn the focus group interviews, we found different categories that play a role for perceived physical exertion in nursing vocational education: 'general conditions', 'patient', 'additional load', 'locomotion', 'awkward postures', 'one-sided load' and 'others'. The factor analyses suggested three factors explaining the structure of the questionnaire. We registered satisfactory item statistics and good internal consistencies for all three factors: 'relocating and handling of objects' (α = 0.967); 'personal care of patients' (α = 0.910); 'relocating patients' (α = .809). The final questionnaire comprises 30 items (28 work-related, two school-related).
conclusionThe developed questionnaire provided initial evidence for content validity and internal consistency of the factors. The instrument can be used to detect perceived physical exertion in nursing students and thus help specifically address health-related problems. There is a need for a further confirmatory approach to cross-validate the questionnaire. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT05817396.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.