Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736604›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2024

Harmonizing measurement tools: examining the concurrent validity of the Daily Activity Behaviors Questionnaire compared to the ActiGraph to assess 24-hour movement behaviors among adults.

Iris Willems, Vera Verbestel, Dorothea Dumuid, Patrick Calders, Bruno Lapauw, Marieke De Craemer

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iris WillemsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Vera VerbestelDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Research Institute of Nutrition and Translation Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Dorothea DumuidAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Patrick CaldersDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Bruno LapauwDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marieke De CraemerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Marieke.decraemer@ugent.be.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek FWO-11N0422N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn accurate assessment of time spent in 24-hour movement behaviors (24 h-MBs) is crucial in exploring health related associations. This study aims to evaluate the concurrent validity of the Daily Activity Behavior Questionnaire (DABQ) compared to the ActiGraph using absolute and relative indicators of validity.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study included 105 adults (45 ± 13 y/o, 54% female). Participants wore an ActiGraph during seven consecutive days followed by filling in the DABQ recalling the past seven days. Intraclass correlations (95% confidence intervals), Bland-Altman plots, Spearman's correlations and the magnitude of error were calculated to estimate the absolute agreement and validity. Interaction effects between sociodemographic variables and the measurement methods were explored in mixed models. All analyses were compared by four commonly used data processing methods for ActiGraph data (cut-points and data reduction method-specific).

resultsModerate absolute agreement (ICC = 0.56) and validity (rho

conclusionCompared to the ActiGraph, the DABQ showed accurate time-use estimates for sleep but presented poor to moderate evidence of validity regarding SB, LPA and MVPA. This was shown in underestimations regarding SB and MVPA, and overestimations regarding LPA. However, educational level and data processing methods contributed to these variations.

Indexed as

ActigraphyExerciseAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSedentary BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors24-hour movement behaviorsAccelerometryPhysical activityQuestionnaireSedentary behaviorSleepTime use epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID39736604
PMCPMC11684262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.