Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736593›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

The use and operationalization of "structural stigma" in health-related research: A scoping review.

Evan L Eschliman, Edwina P Kisanga, Long Jie Huang, Ohemaa B Poku, Becky L Genberg, Danielle German, Sarah M Murray, Lawrence H Yang, Michelle R Kaufman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evan L EschlimanDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. evan.e@columbia.edu.
Edwina P KisangaDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Long Jie HuangDepartment of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Ohemaa B PokuDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Becky L GenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Danielle GermanDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sarah M MurrayDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lawrence H YangDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Michelle R KaufmanDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099NIDA NIH HHS T32DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch that investigates the negative health effects of stigma beyond the individual and interpersonal levels is increasingly using the concept of "structural stigma." This scoping review investigates how the concept of "structural stigma" has been used and operationalized in health-related literature to date in order to characterize its usage and inform future operationalizations.

methodsA systematic search and screening process identified peer-reviewed, English-language research articles that used the term "structural stigma" available prior to January 1, 2024 in five databases (i.e., PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL).

resultsOf the 298 articles identified, over half (53%) were published from 2021 onward. Articles most commonly were set in the United States (n = 163, 55%), investigated stigma toward sexual minority people (n = 163, 55%), and cited the introduction of a special issue of Social Science & Medicine as their source of the concept (n = 84, 28%). Most articles (64%) used at least one additional conceptual framework, most commonly minority stress theory (n = 107, 36%). Quantitative operationalizations (n = 102) engaged most in the conceptual domain of laws and government-level policies, while qualitative operationalizations (n = 68) engaged most with institutional (i.e., non-government-level) policies, practices, and procedures.

conclusionsAs the use of "structural stigma" is increasing, operationalizations can better leverage the concept's breadth and account for individuals' intersectional lived experiences. This will necessitate bridging across methodologies and bodies of research on related negative social processes.

Indexed as

Social StigmaHumansSexual and Gender MinoritiesDiscriminationQualitativeQuantitativeScoping reviewStigmaStructural factors

Identifiers

PMID39736593
PMCPMC11684274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.